Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In terms of client-side image caching, is there a difference between the following:
**Option #1** <div style='background:url('myimage.jpg');display:none;'></div> and
**Option #2** <div id='myimage'></div> style.css #myimage { background:url('myimage.jpg'); display:none; } EDIT: I’m not sure if it matters but the above DIVs are first loaded on another page with style=’display:none;’
No. Also note that some browsers won’t cache graphics ih hidden elements (regrardless of whether you hide them directly or hide one of their parent elements).