Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 375867
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:32:38+00:00 2026-05-12T14:32:38+00:00

int foo(int n) { int x=2; while (x<n) { x = x*x*x; } return

  • 0
int foo(int n) 
{
    int x=2;
    while (x<n)
    {
        x = x*x*x;
    }

    return x;
}

I need to analyze its time complexity. I noticed it reaches n much faster than just log(n). I mean, it does less steps than O(log(n)) would do. I read the answer but have no idea how they got to it: It is O(log(log(n)). Now, how do you approach such a question?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:32:39+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:32 pm

    Let

    L3 = log to the base 3
    L2 = Log to the base 2

    Then the correct answer is O(L3(L2(n)) and NOT O(L2(L2(n)).

    Start with x = x * 2. x will increase exponentially till it reaches n, thus making the time complexity O(L2(n))

    Now consider x = x * x. x increases faster than the above. In every iteration the value of x jumps to the square of its previous value. Doing some simple math, here is what we get:

    For x = 2
    n = 4, iterations taken = 1
    n = 16, iterations taken = 2
    n = 256, iterations taken = 3
    n = 65536, iterations taken = 4

    Thus, the time complexity is O(L2(L2(n)). You can verify this by putting values above values for n.

    Now coming to your problem, x = x * x * x. This will increase even faster than x = x * x. Here is the table:

    For x = 2
    n = 8, iterations taken = 1
    n = 512, iterations taken = 2
    n = (512*512*512), iterations taken = 3 and so on

    If you look at this carefully, this turns out to be O(L3(L2(n)). L2(n) will get you the power of two, but since you are taking cube of x in every iteration, you will have to take log to the base 3 of it to find out the correct number of iteration taken.

    So I think the correct answer is O(log-to-base-3(log-to-base-2(n))

    Generalizing this, if x = x * x * x * x * .. (k times), then the time complexity is O(log-to-base-k(log-to-base-2(n)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following method: public IEnumerable<Foo> GetFoo(int x, string y) { return from
const static int foo = 42; I saw this in some code here on
When you have an array like this: int foo[3][2][2]; and you make: int *bar
Have a interface class abc { public: virtual int foo() = 0; ... }
Suppose I have two classes with the same interface: interface ISomeInterface { int foo{get;
Say I have some windows method and a struct: struct SomeStruct{ int foo; int
First, two examples: // This works int foo = 43; long lFoo = foo;
Given a class like this: class Foo { public: Foo(int); Foo(const Foo&); Foo& operator=(int);
Say I have the following Objective-C class: @interface Foo { int someNumber; NSString *someString;
Is there a side effect in doing this: C code: struct foo { int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.