Is this valid? or does it smell?
What I’d want to do is:
- Have a datacontract object that holds a friendly object tree that can be saved by the service layer without the GUI not having to worry about it.
- At the GUI level I make heavy use of databinding and also have some GUI specific logic (like cloning, flagging as deleted, basic validations, INotifyPropertyChanged etc).
I’d like to extend this DataContract class so I just have to add BindingLists, or my specific GUI logic and then send this object without the need of translating it to the WCF service layer.
Maybe composition is a better approach than extending?
any ideas?
I wouldn’t extend the DataContract class. I would create a Facade that added the extra functionality that I needed and could also handle communicating back down through the DataContract transparently.