Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 268293
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T23:40:51+00:00 2026-05-11T23:40:51+00:00

It probably isn’t even possible to do this, but I will ask anyway. Is

  • 0

It probably isn’t even possible to do this, but I will ask anyway.
Is it possible to create a function that receives a string and then uses it as a right side argument for the goes to operator (=>) used in lambda?

Actually, what I want to do is to be able to redefine an specific method of a specific class during runtime. I want to be write down a function with the program running and attaching it to a delegate. Is it possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 5 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T23:40:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:40 pm

    The easiest way to do it is probably DLINQ as TcKs suggested.

    The fastest (I believe, in 3.5) is to create a DynamicMethod. Its also the scariest method as well. You’re essentially building a method using IL, which has about the same feel as writing code in machine language.

    I needed to do this to dynamically attach event handlers in some thing or another (well, I didn’t need to do it, I just wanted to make unit testing events easier). It seemed a bit daunting at the time because I don’t know crap about IL, but I figured out a simple way to accomplish this.

    What you do is create a method that does exactly what you want. The more compact the better. I’d provide an example if I could figure out exactly what you’re trying to do. You write this method in a class within a DLL project and compile it in release mode. Then you open the DLL in Reflector and disassemble your method. Reflector gives you the option of what language you wish to disassemble to–select IL. You now have the exact calls you need to add to your dynamic method. Just follow the example on MSDN, switching out the example’s IL for your reflected methods’ code.

    Dynamic methods, once constructed, invoke at about the same speed as compiled methods (saw a test where dynamic methods could be called in ~20ms where reflection took over 200ms).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This probably isn't possible, but it's annoying enough to try... For convenience sake I'd
I know this probably isn't possible, but I would like to be able to
It probably isn't possible, but I want to check if something like this can
This probably isn't the best way, but I am currently retrieving the amount of
This probably isn't as complicated as it should be, but Business Objects seems to
Well this probably isn't specific to rails, but in my rails app, I have
I'm aware that there probably isn't a perfect solution to my question (this sounds
This probably isn't the most common filename parsing problem, but I have a program
This probably has a simple answer, but I must not have had enough coffee
This probably sounds really stupid but I have noo idea how to implement jquery's

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.