Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8328469
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T01:27:18+00:00 2026-06-09T01:27:18+00:00

It seems that when overdraw is set to true, the canvas renderer actually expands

  • 0

It seems that when overdraw is set to true, the canvas renderer actually expands the fill beyond the edges of the faces so they overlap a little. This is fine normally, but when the material is transparent, these overlapped edges create an undesireable wireframe-type artifact.

see the pink arrows in the example: Example

Is there a way to play with how much the fill is actually expanded? I’m afraid the source code is simply over my head, but if someone could point out where that’s handled (what line in the source), that would be much appreciated. Failing that, hopefully someone knows another solution or workaround.

I realize the problem goes away when using the WebGL renderer, but I’ve been asked to make this work on Canvas if possible.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T01:27:19+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 1:27 am

    Yep. I’m afraid there is no solution for that using CanvasRenderer.

    But if you want to try some values… this is the function that does that:

    https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/blob/master/src/renderers/CanvasRenderer.js#L1011-1025

    You can try this…

    idet = ( 1 / Math.sqrt( det ) ) * 0.5;
    

    Then, with python installed in your system, go to /utils and run this to generate a new Three.js:

    python build.py --common
    

    And this for minifying it when you’re done:

    python build.py --common --minified
    

    But I think you may get different results in different browsers.

    Curious to know if you solve this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It seems that css animations on firefox are pixelating the edges of elements: Here
It seems that daemon threads are always better - because they will be stopped
It seems that the only way to select a checkable input that is actually
Seems that This will be an easy question for you but this problem is
Seems that even after unchecking the option in the PyDev/Debug preferenecs pane to launch
It seems that we can show layers and even use a different zPosition for
It seems that runClasses() doesn't terminate the code being tested even after the test
It seems that JavaScript's Date() function can only return local date and time. Is
It seems that often I find that my code when moving either from one
It seems that it is not advisable to use <meta http-equiv=REFRESH CONTENT=3;url=url> for redirects

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.