Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 472043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T00:02:48+00:00 2026-05-13T00:02:48+00:00

Java’s WeakHashMap is often cited as being useful for caching. It seems odd though

  • 0

Java’s WeakHashMap is often cited as being useful for caching. It seems odd though that its weak references are defined in terms of the map’s keys, not its values. I mean, it’s the values I want to cache, and which I want to get garbage collected once no-one else besides the cache is strongly referencing them, no?

In which way does it help to hold weak references to the keys? If you do a ExpensiveObject o = weakHashMap.get("some_key"), then I want the cache to hold on to ‘o’ until the caller doesn’t hold the strong reference anymore, and I don’t care at all about the string object “some_key”.

Am I missing something?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T00:02:49+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:02 am

    WeakHashMap isn’t useful as a cache, at least the way most people think of it. As you say, it uses weak keys, not weak values, so it’s not designed for what most people want to use it for (and, in fact, I’ve seen people use it for, incorrectly).

    WeakHashMap is mostly useful to keep metadata about objects whose lifecycle you don’t control. For example, if you have a bunch of objects passing through your class, and you want to keep track of extra data about them without needing to be notified when they go out of scope, and without your reference to them keeping them alive.

    A simple example (and one I’ve used before) might be something like:

    WeakHashMap<Thread, SomeMetaData>
    

    where you might keep track of what various threads in your system are doing; when the thread dies, the entry will be removed silently from your map, and you won’t keep the Thread from being garbage collected if you’re the last reference to it. You can then iterate over the entries in that map to find out what metadata you have about active threads in your system.

    See WeakHashMap in not a cache! for more information.

    For the type of cache you’re after, either use a dedicated cache system (e.g. EHCache) or look at Guava‘s MapMaker class; something like

    new MapMaker().weakValues().makeMap();
    

    will do what you’re after, or if you want to get fancy you can add timed expiration:

    new MapMaker().weakValues().expiration(5, TimeUnit.MINUTES).makeMap();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Java Newbie here. I have a JFrame that I added to my netbeans project,
Java SE 6 (64 bit only) is now on OS X and that is
Java is nearing version 7. It occurs to me that there must be plenty
Java has generics and C++ provides a very strong programming model with template s.
Java has a convenient split method: String str = The quick brown fox; String[]
(Java question) If I reference a field in an inner class, does this cause
Java is one of my programming languages of choice. I always run into the
Java process control is notoriously bad - primarily due to inadequate support by the
Java has the thread dump which is triggered by a signal 3 sent to
Java is the key here. I need to be able to delete files but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.