Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6122957
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T15:57:35+00:00 2026-05-23T15:57:35+00:00

Just like the way we save the instance variables using serialization, is there any

  • 0

Just like the way we save the instance variables using serialization, is there any way by which I can save the state of static members?

If there is a situation, where getting back the state of static members is necessary to restore something, how would one do that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T15:57:35+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:57 pm

    The easiest option that comes to my mind is to use a singleton rather than static fields. The singleton object can be serialized and deserialized, and you can manage its lifetime, while you preserve the ‘global state’ that static fields give you (that said, global state is a bad thing, but that’s a different topic)

    Otherwise – the static state is preserved throughout the lifetime of the classloader (which usually means the lifetime of the JVM). So if you want to persist state, it makes sense to do it on shutdown, and restore it on class load.

    • Runtime.addShutdownHook(..) to perform the serialization on shutdown
    • use a static {..} block to load it on next open

    The serialization format can be anything. JSON, BSON, java serialization (using ObjectOutputStream)

    But this is an unusual and in most cases the wrong thing to do. So make sure this is what you want. If you simply want the state to live for the lifetime of the application, don’t do anything. And if you want to persist something for longer, either pick the singleton option or consider using a small database rather than static fields.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way to have something that looks just like a file on
...just like packages do. I use Emacs (maybe, it can offer some kind of
Ok, I got a directory (for instance, named '/photos') in which there are different
Just like it reads.
Just like Carl's question over here I would like to ask you (because I
I'd like to populate an arraylist by specifying a list of values just like
I want to write something that acts just like confirm() in javascript, but I
I need a collection that works just like a Dictionary/Hashtable in a sense that
I was expecting to find that section within System.Web.Configuration namespace just like other Web.config
i've got a commenting system in our database. Just like stackoverflow -> each post

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.