Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8335023
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T03:32:17+00:00 2026-06-09T03:32:17+00:00

Let’s say I have two modules. One is core and another is core dependent

  • 0

Let’s say I have two modules. One is core and another is core dependent implementation module.
Core is a jar file for that dependent implementation module war.

In the core I have a bean defined like

<bean id="x" class="com.pokuri.X">
 <property name="y" ref="y"/>
 <property name="z" ref="z"/>
</bean>

And that class has a method as follows

public class X{

  public void doSomeJob(){
   .......
  }   

}

this method is being called from some core classes. Now I need to alter the logic in that doSomeJob() method of X as per my core dependent implementation. So, I create a class like this

public class ExtX extends X{

  @override
  public void doSomeJob(){
    // changed logic
  }

}

and defined the bean with same id in another application context xml file like this.

<bean id="x" class="com.pokuri.ExtX">
     <property name="y" ref="y"/>
     <property name="z" ref="z"/>
</bean>

and we are building application context using contextConfigLocation context parameter in web.xml specifying value as classpath:springfolder.

But in the core logic I am getting core bean instance only(i.e X instance) not ExtX. How can we override that bean definition and let system start using new extend bean definition?

And I heard that with same ID in different application context files will override first loaded bean definition with later loaded bean definition. Is there any priority kind of attribute on bean definition to let ApplicationContext use highest priority one to consider over low priority one when beans with same ID were found.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T03:32:20+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 3:32 am

    One way of overriding the bean definition is what you have indicated – to define it with the same id multiple times and the last bean definition with the same id is the one which takes effect. So if you ensure that ExtX is the last one loaded up, it should just work, and to ensure this you can do this in your war file, instead of loading up by saying classpath:springfolder, you can explicitly import the core configuration in your war’s Spring config file and then override the bean this way:

    <import resource="core-resource.xml"/>
    <bean id="x" class="com.pokuri.ExtX">
         <property name="y" ref="y"/>
         <property name="z" ref="z"/>
    </bean>
    

    This will ensure that your overridden bean is the one which takes effect.

    There is no priority/order field that you can make use of here though – if you want you can load up all bean definitions of a type by providing Map<String,X> as a parameter, and sort it by expecting an order property and use it that way, but there is lot more work to it.

    A second approach is described here: Overriding the bean defined in parent context in a child context

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say we have a table that has 2 million rows. It has two
Let me explain best with an example. Say you have node class that can
Let's say that I have a SQLite database that I create in a separate
Let's say I have two tables orgs and states orgs is (o_ID, state_abbr) and
Let's say I have a text file composed like this ##### typeofthread1 ##### typeofthread2
Let's say I have a C++ Visual Studio 2010 solution with 2 projects: one
Let's say I have multiple requirements for a password. The first is that the
Let's say that I have a date in R and it's formatted as follows.
Let assume we have two activities. A - main activity, that is home launcher
Let's say you have a method that expects a numerical value as an argument.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.