Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8261189
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T03:19:05+00:00 2026-06-08T03:19:05+00:00

My Code There’s a small CoffeScript code snipped: Function::trigger = (prop, getter, setter) ->

  • 0

My Code

There’s a small CoffeScript code snipped:

Function::trigger = (prop, getter, setter) ->
      Object.defineProperty this.prototype
              get: getter,
          set: setter

The JavaScript Compilation

The compiler outputs:

Function.prototype.trigger = function(prop, getter, setter) {
  Object.defineProperty(this.prototype({
    get: getter
  }));
  return {
    set: setter
  };
};

But I want the output to be:

Function.prototype.trigger = function(prop, getter, setter) {
  Object.defineProperty(this.prototype({
    get: getter
    set: setter
  };
};

My Questions

  • Why does the compiler output something that strange?
  • How can I change my code in order to get the compiler to output what I want?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T03:19:08+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:19 am

    Your indentation is wrong. Also notice how you forgot the comma after this.prototype, this is making the CoffeeScript compiler think you’re trying to execute the function named this.prototype with an object as an argument.

    Function::trigger = (prop, getter, setter) ->
          Object.defineProperty this.prototype
                  get: getter,
              set: setter
    

    The above code should look like this. Please note that I made some changes to make it more “CoffeeScript-like” 🙂

    Function::trigger = (prop, getter, setter) ->
        Object.defineProperty @::,
            get: getter
            set: setter
    

    Remember, CoffeeScript is whitespace-significant. CoffeeScript also removes a lot of the “fluff” you see in JavaScript (commas, parens, curly braces, etc). Because of this, formatting your code to comply with CoffeeScript standards is vital to writing code that compiles how you expect. If you don’t, the compiler will be forced to make guesses as to what you were trying to do, and it’s often wrong.

    The above example correctly compiles to the following JavaScript (based on coffeescript.org)…

    Function.prototype.trigger = function(prop, getter, setter) {
      return Object.defineProperty(this.prototype, {
        get: getter,
        set: setter
      });
    };
    

    Please note that CoffeeScript will automatically return the last executed expression (in this case, the call to Object.defineProperty). If you want to avoid this behavior (you shouldn’t, but sometimes you need to) you can just add a return statement at the end of your Function.prototype.trigger function, as such:

    Function::trigger = (prop, getter, setter) ->
        Object.defineProperty @::,
            get: getter
            set: setter
    
        return
    

    Which will compile to…

    Function.prototype.trigger = function(prop, getter, setter) {
      Object.defineProperty(this.prototype, {
        get: getter,
        set: setter
      });
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In the Code Below there are Two Classes. One Object of type two is
There is this code: char text[] = zim; int x = 777; If I
I have written some code there are 27 different functions that execute like this..
With this code there's the possibility that the user would enter either a 0
I am using the apple example code SpleakHere . in this code there is
To start out with - this is not my code - there was a
With this code there is no change in my database. when the above code
In the below code there is a conversion operator for converting class A object
/ At the bottom of this code there are two if statements. I want
In the following code there is function(i), but i hasn't been declared anywhere previous

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.