Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8262915
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T03:55:12+00:00 2026-06-08T03:55:12+00:00

My problem is, I have a bunch of classes that extend Struct.new. And now

  • 0

My problem is, I have a bunch of classes that extend Struct.new. And now I need add a common class method to all of them.
If Struct was a ‘normal’ superclass, I would be able to define a class method on it and then every subclass would also have that method.

Given, that it is not, how do I replicate this behaviour?
For example,

class Foo < Struct.new(:foo); end
Foo.respond_to?(:perform) #=> true
class Bar < Struct.new(:bar); end
Bar.respond_to?(:perform) #=> true
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T03:55:14+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:55 am

    Why can’t you define a method on Struct?

    def Struct.perform
    end
    
    class Foo < Struct.new(:foo); end
    Foo.respond_to?(:perform) #=> true
    class Bar < Struct.new(:bar); end
    Bar.respond_to?(:perform) #=> true
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here is my problem. I have a bunch of Configuration classes that get serialized
Problem I have a UDPlistener application that I need to write a unit test
I have created a functional OOP program that uses a bunch of classes, and
I'm trying to design a class hierarchy with a bunch of similar classes that
I have a bunch of classes that i have to tweak for improved memory
I am confused by C# right now. I have a bunch of classes, say
I have a base class and a dozen derived classes. All but one derived
I have a bunch of classes that implement cached properties that return collections of
I have a bunch of elements that trigger a tooltip on hover. The problem
I have a problem. I have a bunch webpage that makes heavy use of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.