Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8288401
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T12:16:42+00:00 2026-06-08T12:16:42+00:00

Normally I would set a functions variables with something like this: var width =

  • 0

Normally I would set a functions variables with something like this:

var width = null;
var height = null;

if(options) {
    if(options.width) width = options.width;
    if(options.height) height = options.height;
}

Is there a way to simplify this with something like:

var width = null;
var height = null;

if(options) {
    for(var val in options) {
        val = options[val];
    }
}

In this simple example it doesn’t seem like a big benefit, but in a situation where I have a multitude of variables to set with values from a single object (in such a way that say…ajax does it), it would be much easier to just loop the object and do it that way.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T12:16:43+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 12:16 pm

    Not directly. If you want to attach things to the global namespace (window), you could write something like this:

    if (options) {
      for(var val in options) {
        window[val] = options[val];
      }
    }
    

    …but you would generally want to avoid cluttering up window unless absolutely necessary. A commonly used alternative would be to create an object for holding default options, and simply overwrite them as new options are provided:

    var defaults = {
      height: 0,
      width: 0
    }
    
    if (options) {
      for(var val in options) {
        defaults[val] = options[val];
      }
    }
    
    // use values now stored in `defaults`
    console.log(defaults.height);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to know how you normally deal with this situation: I have
If I have a table of a hundred users normally I would just set
Normally I would just do this. $str = preg_replace('#(\d+)#', ' $1 ', $str); If
Normally I would just use URL GET parameters but CodeIgniter doesn't seem to like
This kind of code would normally work in PHP, but since the scope is
I have this code that where I would normally use one line: if (tableView
I have a CCK datetime field and would like to set its default value
Normally I would go: bgwExportGrid.RunWorkerCompleted += ReportManager.RunWorkerCompleted; The ReportManager class is a static class
Normally it would be in such a structure: ../application/modules/somemodule/views/scripts/index/index.phtml How I move it to:
Normally I would have one junit test that shows up in my integration server

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.