Ok, I want this:

For that, I have this HTML code:
<div id="wrapForCenter">
<div id="title">
title
</div>
<div id="contentFrame">
<div id="imagePlaceholder">
image
</div>
<div id="content">
content
</div>
</div>
<div id="buttonsBar">
buttonsBar
</div>
</div>
And I have this CSS code:
#wrapForCenter
{
position: absolute;
top:50%;
left: 50%;
margin-top: -160px;
margin-left: -240px;
width: 480px;
height: 320px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
#title
{
width: 100%;
height: 40px;
background-color: Blue;
}
#contentFrame
{
height: 240px;
width: 480px;
}
#imagePlaceholder
{
float: left;
width: 100px;
height: 100%;
background-color: Green;
}
#content
{
float: left;
width: 380px; /*<-- look at this*/
height: 100%;
background-color: Yellow;
overflow: auto;
}
#buttonsBar
{
clear: left;
width: 100%;
height: 40px;
background-color: Silver;
}
If I change the contents width to 100%, why occurs this?

What I spect is that content width would be contentFrame minus imagePlacehoder width in pixels, but when I specify float:left for both, imagePlacehoder and content, content gets its parent container width. Why?
Is there another way to get the same result without using float (maybe display:inline)? And using width:100% for content?
Thank you very much. CSS is not my strenght.
This is called a float drop. Floats work such that they’ll fit side-by-side as long as there’s enough room for each, but a float will bump down below the previous one if there’s not enough room for it to fit.
width:100%means make it 100% as wide as its container (#wrapForCenter). Naturally, if you tell something to be the entire width of it’s container, nothing can fit along either side inside of that container, so as a float it must move down below whatever is before it (an earlier “sibling”) to fit.