Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 683201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:40:52+00:00 2026-05-14T01:40:52+00:00

Okay I’m looking for some input, I’m pretty sure this is not currently supported

  • 0

Okay I’m looking for some input, I’m pretty sure this is not currently supported in .NET 3.5 but here goes.

I want to require a generic type passed into my class to have a constructor like this:

new(IDictionary<string,object>)

so the class would look like this

public MyClass<T>  where T : new(IDictionary<string,object>)
{
  T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values)
  {
    return new T(values);
  }
}

But the compiler doesn’t support this, it doesn’t really know what I’m asking.

Some of you might ask, why do you want to do this? Well I’m working on a pet project of an ORM so I get values from the DB and then create the object and load the values.

I thought it would be cleaner to allow the object just create itself with the values I give it. As far as I can tell I have two options:

1) Use reflection(which I’m trying to avoid) to grab the PropertyInfo[] array and then use that to load the values.

2) require T to support an interface like so:

public interface ILoadValues
{
void LoadValues(IDictionary values);
}

and then do this

public MyClass<T> where T:new(),ILoadValues
{
  T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values)
  {
    T obj = new T();
    obj.LoadValues(values);
    return obj;
  }
}

The problem I have with the interface I guess is philosophical, I don’t really want to expose a public method for people to load the values. Using the constructor the idea was that if I had an object like this

namespace DataSource.Data
{
  public class User
  {
    protected internal User(IDictionary<string,object> values)
    {
      //Initialize
    }
  }
}

As long as the MyClass<T> was in the same assembly the constructor would be available. I personally think that the Type constraint in my opinion should ask (Do I have access to this constructor? I do, great!)

Anyways any input is welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:40:53+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:40 am

    If you can create common base class for all of T ojects that you are going to pass to MyClass as type parameters than you can do following:

    internal interface ILoadValues
    {
        void LoadValues<TKey, TValue>(IDictionary<TKey, TValue> values);
    }
    
    public class Base : ILoadValues
    {
        void ILoadValues.LoadValues<TKey, TValue>(IDictionary<TKey, TValue> values)
        {
            // Load values.
        }
    }
    
    public class MyClass<T>
        where T : Base, new()
    {
        public T CreateObject(IDictionary<string,object> values)
        {
            ILoadValues obj = new T();
            obj.LoadValues(values);
            return (T)obj;
        }
    }
    

    If you cannot have common base class than I think you should go with solution proposed by itowlson.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Okay so im working on this php image upload system but for some reason
Okay, so this probably sounds terribly nefarious, but I need such capabilities for my
Okay, here's the scenario. I have a utility that processes tons of records, and
Okay, I've seen but haven't programmed in C# before. You can assume I'm competent
Okay. I know this looks like the typical Why didn't he just Google it
Okay, so I'm doing my first foray into using the ADO.NET Entity Framework. My
Okay, I've looked all over the internet for a good solution to get PHP
Okay, so I'm running a small test webserver on my private network. I've got
Okay, so I'm making a table right now for Box Items. Now, a Box
Okay, we know that the following two lines are equivalent - (0 == i)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.