Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 711835
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T04:46:49+00:00 2026-05-14T04:46:49+00:00

On this post , I read about the usage of XMPP. Is this sort

  • 0

On this post, I read about the usage of XMPP. Is this sort of thing necessary, and more importantly, my main question expanded: Can a chat server and client be built efficiently using only standard HTTP and browser technologies (such as PHP and JS, or RoR and JS, etc)? Or, is it best to stick with old protocols like XMPP find a way to integrate them with my application?

I looked into CampFire via LiveHTTPHeaders and Firebug for about 5 minutes, and it appears to use Ajax to send a request which is never answered until another chat happens. Is this just CampFire opening a new thread on the server to listen for an update and then returning a response to the request when the thread hears an update? I noticed that they’re requesting on a specific port (8043 if memory serves me) which makes me think that they’re doing something more complex than just what I mentioned. Also, the URL requested started with /tcp/ which I found interesting.

Note: I don’t expect to ever have more than 150 users live-chatting in all the rooms combined at the same time. I understand that if I was building a hosted pay for chat service like CampFire with thousands of concurrent users, it would behoove me to invest time in researching special technologies vs trying to reinvent the wheel in a simple way in my app.

Also, if you’re going to do it with server polling, how often would you personally poll to maximize response without slamming the server?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T04:46:49+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:46 am

    The technology is broadly called Comet, which is supposedly some hilarious pun on Ajax1.

    The XmlHTTPResponse variant seems to be the most popular.

    The XHR version isn’t strictly polling per se; as you said, the client connects with a long timeout and the server doesn’t actually send a response until there is anything to send. Once the response is sent, it drops the connection and the client reconnects. They call it long polling, because the client is initiating the connection, but it differs from classic polling in that the client doesn’t constantly connect requesting new content even if nothing has changed (i.e. no “is there a message now? no? how about now? what about now?”)

    It’s more like trying to keep a constantly dropping connection open.

    Yes it can absolutely be built using standard web technologies.


    1I prefer to think of Ajax as a mighty Greek warrior rather than a cleaning product, so I frown mightily upon this pun.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read this post about how to test private methods. I usually do
I just read this post about why new-line warnings exist, but to be honest
Just finished read this post by Greg Young, where he is talking about Microsoft
So I've already read this post about there not being an MGET analog for
I've read two articles about heap-spraying: Wikiepdia and this blog post . I understand
Apologies for the long post -- Read a few threads about this, but still
I read this post last night, and I noticed it was from 2006. I
So this post talked about how to actually implement url rewriting in an ASP.NET
Background this post explains how one can consume extension methods in Powershell http://community.bartdesmet.net/blogs/bart/archive/2007/09/06/extension-methods-in-windows-powershell.aspx Compare
While reading proggit today, I came upon this comment in a post about how

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.