Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 682115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:33:34+00:00 2026-05-14T01:33:34+00:00

Our production environment runs 3 32-Bit Java 6 JVMs on each Windows 2003 server.

  • 0

Our production environment runs 3 32-Bit Java 6 JVMs on each Windows 2003 server. Each heap is at it’s max setting (~1.25GB). We are considering moving to new servers and using 64-Bit JVMs. Presumably we can then have one 64-bit JVM on each server that would replace the 3 32-Bit JVMs on each server because of the allowance for a much larger heap size when using a 64-bit JVM.

Anyone done this and have any lessons learned?

I am specifically concerned with any performance considerations and what to do to compensate.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:33:35+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:33 am

    The memory requirements will go up as it is more expensive to address objects on a 64 bit architecture. How much is really depending on your application. A wild guess would be 10%-20%, assuming that you are not hashing 4 gb of Integers…

    You may also get problems with lock contention on locks in loggers, thread pools, connection pools, singletons etc. It is probably not a problem if your application is database centric, but if – for example- Your application is storing a lot of sessions in a map, and access that map a lot, you might get problems. The contention “wall” can come rather quickly, in my experience.

    However, there is only one way to know : …test it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have Windows Server 2008 as our Production server hosted in RackSpace environment. Following
All - I have recently upgraded our production environment from Sql Server Reporting Services
In our production environment, weblogic server hangs for half an hour, It looks like
I have a J2EE java application which processes SOAP requests. In our production environment
It's really tricky in our production environment( Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4
Currently our production environment runs JBoss 5.1 and we have been debating whether or
Our production environment is: IIS 6.0 .Net framework 4.0 ASP.Net 4.0 thread pool However,
In our Production environment we have JBoss running in a clustered mode with 4+
I have a problem in our BTS production environment which we cannot reproduce in
The security policy at our client's production environment requires that we use separate connection

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.