Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8357731
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T10:34:27+00:00 2026-06-09T10:34:27+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Scala operator oddity I’m very new to Scala and I read that

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Scala operator oddity

I’m very new to Scala and I read that in this language everything is an Object, cool. Also, if a method has only 1 argument, then we can omit the ‘.’ and the parentesis ‘( )’, that’s ok.

So, if we take the following Scala example: 3 + 2, ‘3’ and ‘2’ are two Int Objects and ‘+’ is a method, sounds ok. Then 3 + 2 is just the shorthand for 3.+(2), this looks very weird but I still get it.

Now let’s compare the following blocks on code on the REPL:

scala> 3 + 2
res0: Int = 5

scala> 3.+(2)
res1: Double = 5.0

What’s going on here? Why does the explicit syntax return a Double while the shorthand returns an Int??

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T10:34:29+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 10:34 am

    3. is a Double. The lexer gets there first. Try (3).+(2).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: “new” keyword in Scala Ive noticed that creating certain instances in Scala
Possible Duplicate: Why are singleton objects more object orientated? Why does Scala have language
Possible Duplicate: ++ operator in Scala I want to increment an Int variable in
Possible Duplicate: scala and traits on object instances Is it possible to mix in
Possible Duplicate: Scala “<-” for comprehension Could someone please explain how the <- operator
Possible Duplicate: Scala equivalent of Java java.lang.Class<T> Object Hi all, I can not call
Possible Duplicate: Tuple parameter declaration and assignment oddity In Scala, one can do multiple-variable
Possible Duplicate: val and object inside a scala class? Is there a substantive difference
Possible Duplicate: How to unimport String “+” operator in Scala? So things from Predef
Possible Duplicate: Scala on Android: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.String.isEmpty I've just released a new app on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.