Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8372055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T14:19:12+00:00 2026-06-09T14:19:12+00:00

Possible Duplicate: What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?

I know that when [] is coerced to a string it returns the empty string (""), and when {} is coerced to a string it returns "[object Object]".

When I run [] + {} in my browser’s Javascript console, it returns as I would expect:

>> [] + {}
"[object Object]"

But when I run {} + [], it returns a completely unexpected value:

>> {} + []
0

What could be causing it to return 0?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T14:19:14+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 2:19 pm

    When there is a { at the beginning of a statement, it will be interpreted as a block, which may contain zero or more statements. An block with no statements in it will have an empty continuation value.

    In other words, in this case, {} is interpreted as an empty code block.

    The statement ends after the ending brace }, which means that the next three characters +[] comprise a statement of their own.

    At the beginning of an expression or statement, + is the unary plus operator, which coerces its operand to a number.

    So +[] is the same as Number([]), which evaluates to 0.

    In short, {} + [] is an empty code block followed by an array coerced to a number.


    All that said, if you evaluate {} + [] inside an expression, it will return what you expect:

    >> ({} + []) 
    "[object Object]" 
    

    Another interesting thing is that you cannot begin a statement with an object literal because the interpreter will try to parse it as a statement. Doing this

    { "object": "literal" };
    

    will throw a syntax error.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the
Possible Duplicate: What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the
Possible Duplicate: A concise explanation of nil v. empty v. blank in Ruby on
Possible Duplicate: Array slicing in Ruby: looking for explanation for illogical behaviour (taken from
Possible Duplicate: && operator in Javascript In the sample code of the ExtJS web
Possible Duplicate: Plain english explanation of Big O I'd imagine this is probably something
Possible Duplicate: adding media element in windows phone 7? I Want Details Explanation and
Possible Duplicate: Big O, how do you calculate/approximate it? Plain English explanation of Big
Possible Duplicate: What is the !! (not not) operator in JavaScript? What does the
Possible Duplicate: Plain English explanation of Big O I was recently asked about my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.