Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8217837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T12:35:00+00:00 2026-06-07T12:35:00+00:00

public class Address{ public string ContactName {get; private set;} public string Company {get; private

  • 0
public class Address{
    public string ContactName {get; private set;}
    public string Company {get; private set;}
    //...
    public string Zip {get; private set;}
}

I’d like to implement a notion of distinct addresses, so I overrode Equals() to test for case-insensitive equality in all of the fields (as these are US addresses, I used Ordinal instead of InvariantCulture for maximum performance):

public override bool Equals(Object obj){
    if (obj == null || this.GetType() != obj.GetType())
        return false;

    Address o = (Address)obj;

    return  
    (string.Compare(this.ContactName, o.ContactName, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) == 0) &&
    (string.Compare(this.Company, o.Company, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) == 0)
    // ...
    (string.Compare(this.Zip, o.Zip, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) == 0)
}

I’d like to write a GetHashCode() similarly like so (ignore the concatenation inefficiency for the moment):

public override int GetHashCode(){
    return (this.contactName + this.address1 + this.zip).ToLowerOrdinal().GetHashCode();
}

but that doesn’t exist. What should I use instead? Or should I just use InvariantCulture in my Equals() method?

(I’m thinking .ToLowerInvariant().GetHashCode(), but I’m not 100% sure that InvariantCulture can’t decide that an identical character (such as an accent) has a different meaning in another context.)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T12:35:01+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 12:35 pm

    Two unequal objects can have the same hashcode. Though two equal objects should never have different hashcodes. If you use InvariantCulture for your hashcode it will still be correct as far as the contract for Equals goes if it’s implemented in terms of OrdinalIgnoreCase.

    From the documentation on StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase (emphasis mine):

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.stringcomparer.ordinalignorecase.aspx

    The StringComparer returned by the OrdinalIgnoreCase property treats
    the characters in the strings to compare as if they were converted to
    uppercase using the conventions of the invariant culture, and
    then performs a simple byte comparison that is independent of
    language. This is most appropriate when comparing strings that are
    generated programmatically or when comparing case-insensitive
    resources such as paths and filenames.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following: public class Address { public string Email { get; set;
public class MyClass { public string MyProperty{ get; set; } Now, I would like
public class Address { public string AddressLine1 { get; set; } public string AddressLine2
See my Problem: public class Address { public string Title{get;set;} public string Description{get;set;} }
for sake of simplicity: public class Person { String name; Set<Address> addresses; } public
public class Address { public string ZipCode {get; set;} } public class Customer {
I have the following class: class Address { public string City {get; set;} public
My Address Class: public class Address implements java.io.Serializable { private String addressId; private String
public class User { public string FirstName { get; set; } public string LastName
I have the following Model: public class Person { public string Name {get;set;} public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.