Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6198175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T03:57:06+00:00 2026-05-24T03:57:06+00:00

Question about the implementation of the each function I found in the underscore.js source

  • 0

Question about the implementation of the “each” function I found in the underscore.js source code (source below).

First, could someone explain what the line “else if (obj.length === +obj.length) ” is checking for.

Second, could someone explain why hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key) is used, as opposed to obj.hasOwnProperty? Is it because the passed in obj may not implement hasOwnProperty (which I thought every javascript object did)

any insights appreciated. Thanks.

  // The cornerstone, an `each` implementation, aka `forEach`.
  // Handles objects with the built-in `forEach`, arrays, and raw objects.
  // Delegates to **ECMAScript 5**'s native `forEach` if available.

  var each = _.each = _.forEach = function(obj, iterator, context) {

    if (obj == null) return;
    if (nativeForEach && obj.forEach === nativeForEach) {
      obj.forEach(iterator, context);
    } else if (obj.length === +obj.length) {
      for (var i = 0, l = obj.length; i < l; i++) {
        if (i in obj && iterator.call(context, obj[i], i, obj) === breaker) return;

      }
    } else {
      for (var key in obj) {
        if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
          if (iterator.call(context, obj[key], key, obj) === breaker) return;
        }
      }
    }
  };
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T03:57:07+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 3:57 am

    This:

    +obj.length
    

    …will do a toNumber conversion on the value of length.

    It appears as though they’re making sure that length references a number by doing the toNumber conversion, and verifying that it’s still the same number after the conversion.

    If so, they assume that it is an Array, or at least an Array-like object for iteration.

    If not, they assume that enumeration of all key value pairs is desired.

    var obj = {
         length:null,
         someprop:'some value'
    };
    
    obj.length === +obj.length; // false, so do the enumeration
    
    var obj = {
        length: 2,
        "0":'some value',
        "1":'some other value'
    };
    
    obj.length === +obj.length;  // true, not an actual Array, 
                                 //     but iteration is still probably wanted
    

    Of course you could have an object with a length property that is a primitive number, but still intend to enumerate the properties.

    var obj = {
        length: 2,
        "prop1":'some value',
        "prop2":'some other value'
    };
    
    obj.length === +obj.length;  // true, it will iterate, but it would
                                 //           seem that enumeration is intended
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I recently asked a question about IIf vs. If and found out that there
My question about the reconfiguration delay when switching between Access 2003 and 2007 the
I was reading this question about how to parse URLs out of web pages
I recently asked a question about what I called method calls. The answer referred
I recently asked a question about Oracle Encryption. Along the way to finding a
I have a question about using streams in .NET to load files from disk.
I have a question about best practices regarding how one should approach storing complex
Following Izb's question about Best binary XML format for JavaME , I'm looking for
I have a curious question about efficiency. Say I have a field on a
I have a question about locking. This doesn't have to be only about record

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.