Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6891617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:25:57+00:00 2026-05-27T06:25:57+00:00

Scenario 1: I have two classes: Post : class Post { String content Date

  • 0

Scenario 1:
I have two classes:

Post:

class Post {
String content
Date dateCreated
static constraints = {
content(blank: false)
}
static belongsTo = [ user : User ]
}

User:

class User {
// existing code here
static hasMany = [ posts : Post ]
}

Its a classical one-many relationship. The integration test for these classes:

void testFirstPost() {
def user = new User(userId: 'joe',password: 'secret').save()
def post1 = new Post(content: "First post... W00t!")
user.addToPosts(post1)
def post2 = new Post(content: "Second post...")
user.addToPosts(post2) }

Works very well. But if you consider the other two classes like:

Scenario 2:

User:

class User {
    String login
    String password
    Profile profile
    Status status
    static hasMany = [ holidays : Holiday ]
    static constraints = { 
        login(unique:true,size:2..20)
        password(size:2..20) //more to be added later!
        profile(nullable:true)
        company(nullable:true)
    }
    static belongsTo = [ company : Company ]
}

Company:

class Company {
    String shortName;
    String name 
    Date dateCreated
    String region
    String email
    Address address
    Status status   
    Long tel
    Long fax
    static hasMany = [ users : User]
        static constraints = {
        }
    static mapping = {
        address lazy:false
        status lazy:false
    }
}

Again the classical one-many relationship.

For these classes, I have written the test like this:

void testSaveUser() {
        def status1 = new Status(name:"Busy")
        status1.save(flush:true)        
        def user = new User(login:"anto",password:"anything",
            status:status1)
        assert user.save(flush:true, failOnError: true)
    }

Even this test works fine. Note that in second User class, I have made the constraint for company field as company(nullable:true), if I didn’t put this the above test(testSaveUser()) fails!.

The error I’m getting is this:

Validation Error(s) occurred during save(): - Field error in object 'mnm.User' on field 'company': rejected value [null]; codes [mnm.User.company.nullable.error.mnm.User.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.error.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.error.mnm.Company,mnm.User.company.nullable.error,user.company.nullable.error.mnm.User.company,user.company.nullable.error.company,user.company.nullable.error.mnm.Company,user.company.nullable.error,mnm.User.company.nullable.mnm.User.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.mnm.Company,mnm.User.company.nullable,user.company.nullable.mnm.User.company,user.company.nullable.company,user.company.nullable.mnm.Company,user.company.nullable,nullable.mnm.User.company,nullable.company,nullable.mnm.Company,nullable]; arguments [company,class mnm.User]; default message [Property [{0}] of class [{1}] cannot be null]
grails.validation.ValidationException: Validation Error(s) occurred during save():
- Field error in object 'mnm.User' on field 'company': rejected value [null]; codes [mnm.User.company.nullable.error.mnm.User.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.error.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.error.mnm.Company,mnm.User.company.nullable.error,user.company.nullable.error.mnm.User.company,user.company.nullable.error.company,user.company.nullable.error.mnm.Company,user.company.nullable.error,mnm.User.company.nullable.mnm.User.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.company,mnm.User.company.nullable.mnm.Company,mnm.User.company.nullable,user.company.nullable.mnm.User.company,user.company.nullable.company,user.company.nullable.mnm.Company,user.company.nullable,nullable.mnm.User.company,nullable.company,nullable.mnm.Company,nullable]; arguments [company,class mnm.User]; default message [Property [{0}] of class [{1}] cannot be null]

    at mnm.UserIntegrationTests.testSaveUser(UserIntegrationTests.groovy:18)

Even though the both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 are same, why does the Scenario 2 forces me to add the company(nullable:true) constraint?

(Note that I’m using Grails 1.3.7 and ran the two Scenarios in the same version!.)

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:25:58+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:25 am

    If something belongsTo something else, by default it cannot be null

    In your test, you do not (still) set a company for the user before you save it, so it will fail with the default constraint

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have two classes like this: class A{ private static Random random =
I have the following scenario (in Java / Hibernate): I have two entity classes:
So I have this two classes: public class PhysicalTest { public int ID {
I have a class which will contain list of two dependent classes inside it.
I have two classes in python Drunk Usual Drunk The usual drunk class inherits
I have two classes (class A and B) both marked with [Binding]. Currently I'm
For simplicity let's say I have two classes: a class called Car and a
I'm thinking today at the following scenario: I have two classes A and B.
Lets say that I have the two following classes public class OtherClass { public
I have a scenario in which I have a class Resource which has two

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.