Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8230889
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T17:17:12+00:00 2026-06-07T17:17:12+00:00

Since Google Documents List API Version 3.0, there is now no separate Java guide

  • 0

Since Google Documents List API Version 3.0, there is now no separate Java guide as there was for v2.0 (now deprecated).

There are sprinklings of Java but mostly there is .Net.
I’m having to refer to the deprecated API (v2.0) to get meaningful documentation for Java.

Just wondering if the Java doc is going to be updated at some point to be as complete as .Net
and do you recommend we keep using the deprecated API doco in the meantime.

I thought Google was a Python / Java house so why the .Net bias ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T17:17:13+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 5:17 pm

    You should adopt the newer Google Drive API, which has all the features of the Documents List API and complete Java documentation:

    https://developers.google.com/drive/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Since Google Maps for Flash is deprecated ( see this ), what is the
Since there is no way to join tables using Google App Engine datastore, I
I know this is up to google, but since the web has evolved then
since Google translate api will stop working i'm trying to implement some jquery code
I wrote some small script, but since I did it with Google help I
Since Google App Engine is a PaaS does it use any hypervisor? it is
Since while Google Chrome started to beehive strange with Adobe Flash Player. I have
Since short time ago, Google + has had hangouts implemented on the iPhone. You
I was having problems with the DOM since elemnets inside of google visualization tables/graphs
I want to call a webservice using google closures, via jsonp since i am

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.