Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 925503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T19:31:48+00:00 2026-05-15T19:31:48+00:00

Since I love progamming in both C# and C++, I’m about to implementing a

  • 0

Since I love progamming in both C# and C++, I’m about to implementing a C#-like event system as a solid base for my planned C++ SFML-GUI.

This is only an excerpt of my code and I hope this clarifies my concept:

// Event.h
// STL headers:
#include <functional>
#include <type_traits>
#include <iostream>
// boost headers:
#include <boost/signals/trackable.hpp>
#include <boost/signal.hpp>

namespace Utils
{
    namespace Gui
    {
        #define IMPLEMENTS_EVENT(EVENTNAME, EVENTARGS) public: \
            Utils::Gui::IEvent<EVENTARGS>& EVENTNAME() { return m_on##EVENTNAME; } \
        protected: \
            virtual void On##EVENTNAME(EVENTARGS& e) { m_on##EVENTNAME(this, e); } \
        private: \
            Utils::Gui::Event<EVENTARGS> m_on##EVENTNAME;


        #define MAKE_EVENTFIRING_CLASS(EVENTNAME, EVENTARGS) class Fires##EVENTNAME##Event \
        { \
            IMPLEMENTS_EVENT(EVENTNAME, EVENTARGS); \
        };


        class EventArgs
        {
        public:
            static EventArgs Empty;
        };

        EventArgs EventArgs::Empty = EventArgs();

        template<class TEventArgs>
        class EventHandler : public std::function<void (void*, TEventArgs&)>
        {
            static_assert(std::is_base_of<EventArgs, TEventArgs>::value, 
                "EventHandler must be instantiated with a TEventArgs template paramater type deriving from EventArgs.");
        public:
            typedef void Signature(void*, TEventArgs&);
            typedef void (*HandlerPtr)(void*, TEventArgs&);

            EventHandler() : std::function<Signature>() { }

            template<class TContravariantEventArgs>
            EventHandler(const EventHandler<TContravariantEventArgs>& rhs)
                : std::function<Signature>(reinterpret_cast<HandlerPtr>(*rhs.target<EventHandler<TContravariantEventArgs>::HandlerPtr>())) 
            {
                static_assert(std::is_base_of<TContravariantEventArgs, TEventArgs>::value,
                    "The eventHandler instance to copy does not suffice the rules of contravariance.");
            }

            template<class F>
            EventHandler(F f) : std::function<Signature>(f) { }

            template<class F, class Allocator>
            EventHandler(F f, Allocator alloc) : std::function<Signature>(f, alloc) { }
        };

        template<class TEventArgs>
        class IEvent
        {
        public:
            typedef boost::signal<void (void*, TEventArgs&)> SignalType;

            void operator+= (const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler)
            {
                Subscribe(eventHandler);
            }

            void operator-= (const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler)
            {
                Unsubscribe(eventHandler);
            }

            virtual void Subscribe(const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler) = 0;

            virtual void Subscribe(const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler, int group) = 0;

            virtual void Unsubscribe(const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler) = 0;
        };

        template<class TEventArgs>
        class Event : public IEvent<TEventArgs>
        {
        public:
            virtual void Subscribe(const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler)
            {
                m_signal.connect(*eventHandler.target<EventHandler<TEventArgs>::HandlerPtr>());
            }

            virtual void Subscribe(const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler, int group)
            {
                m_signal.connect(group, *eventHandler.target<EventHandler<TEventArgs>::HandlerPtr>());
            }

            virtual void Unsubscribe(const EventHandler<TEventArgs>& eventHandler)
            {
                m_signal.disconnect(*eventHandler.target<EventHandler<TEventArgs>::HandlerPtr>());
            }

            void operator() (void* sender, TEventArgs& e)
            {
                m_signal(sender, e);
            }

        private:
            SignalType m_signal;
        };

        class IEventListener : public boost::signals::trackable
        {
        };
    };
};

As you can see, I’m using boost::signal as my actual event system, but I encapsulate it with the IEvent interface (which is actually an abstract class) to prevent event listeners to fire the event via operator().

For convenience I overloaded the add-assignment and subtract-assignment operators. If I do now derive my event listening classes from IEventListener, I am able to write code without needing to worry about dangling function pointer in the signal.

So far I’m testing my results, but I have trouble with std::tr1::function::target<TFuncPtr>():

class BaseEventArgs : public Utils::Gui::EventArgs
{
};

class DerivedEventArgs : public BaseEventArgs
{
};

void Event_BaseEventRaised(void* sender, BaseEventArgs& e)
{
    std::cout << "Event_BaseEventRaised called";
}

void Event_DerivedEventRaised(void* sender, DerivedEventArgs& e)
{
   std::cout << "Event_DerivedEventRaised called";
}

int main()
{
    using namespace Utils::Gui;
    typedef EventHandler<BaseEventArgs>::HandlerPtr pfnBaseEventHandler;
    typedef EventHandler<DerivedEventArgs>::HandlerPtr pfnNewEventHandler;

    // BaseEventHandler with a function taking a BaseEventArgs
    EventHandler<BaseEventArgs> baseEventHandler(Event_BaseEventRaised);
    // DerivedEventHandler with a function taking a DerivedEventArgs
    EventHandler<DerivedEventArgs> newEventHandler(Event_DerivedEventRaised);
    // DerivedEventHandler with a function taking a BaseEventArgs -> Covariance
    EventHandler<DerivedEventArgs> covariantBaseEventHandler(Event_BaseEventRaised);

    const pfnBaseEventHandler* pBaseFunc = baseEventHandler.target<pfnBaseEventHandler>();
    std::cout << "baseEventHandler function pointer is " << ((pBaseFunc != nullptr) ? "valid" : "invalid") << std::endl;

    const pfnNewEventHandler* pNewFunc = newEventHandler.target<pfnNewEventHandler>();
    std::cout << "baseEventHandler function pointer is " << ((pNewFunc != nullptr) ? "valid" : "invalid") << std::endl;

    // Here is the error, covariantBaseEventHandler actually stores a pfnBaseEventHandler:
    pNewFunc = covariantBaseEventHandler.target<pfnNewEventHandler>();
    std::cout << "covariantBaseEventHandler as pfnNewEventHandler function pointer is " << ((pNewFunc != nullptr) ? "valid" : "invalid") << std::endl;

    // This works as expected, but template forces compile-time knowledge of the function pointer type
    pBaseFunc = covariantBaseEventHandler.target<pfnBaseEventHandler>();
    std::cout << "covariantBaseEventHandler as pfnBaseEventHandler function pointer is " << ((pBaseFunc != nullptr) ? "valid" : "invalid") << std::endl;

    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

The EventHandler<TEventArgs>::target<TFuncPtr>() method will only return a valid pointer if TFuncPtr is the exact same type as stored in the Functor, regardless of covariance.
Because of the RTTI check, it prohibits to access the pointer as a standard weakly-typed C function pointer, which is kind of annoying in cases like this one.

The EventHandler is of type DerivedEventArgs but nevertheless points to a pfnBaseEventHandler function even though the function ran through the constructor.

That means, that std::tr1::function itself “supports” contravariance, but I can’t find a way of simply getting the function pointer out of the std::tr1::funcion object if I don’t know its type at compile time which is required for a template argument.

I would appreciate in cases like this that they added a simple get() method like they did for RAII pointer types.

Since I’m quite new to programming, I would like to know if there is a way to solve this problem, preferrably at compile-time via templates (which I think would be the only way).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T19:31:48+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:31 pm

    Just found a solution for the problem. It seems that I just missed a cast at a different location:

    template<class TEventArgs>
    class EventHandler : public std::function<void (void*, TEventArgs&)>
    {
    public:
        typedef void Signature(void*, TEventArgs&);
        typedef void (*HandlerPtr)(void*, TEventArgs&);
    
        // ...
    
        template<class TContravariantEventArgs>
        EventHandler(const EventHandler<TContravariantEventArgs>& rhs)
            : std::function<Signature>(reinterpret_cast<HandlerPtr>(*rhs.target<EventHandler<TContravariantEventArgs>::HandlerPtr>())) 
        {
            static_assert(std::is_base_of<TContravariantEventArgs, TEventArgs>::value,
                "The eventHandler instance to copy does not suffice the rules of contravariance.");
        }
    
        // ...
    }
    

    This works how it is supposed to work. Thank you nonetheless for giving me a smooth introduction into this really awesome community!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.