Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8202295
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T07:07:57+00:00 2026-06-07T07:07:57+00:00

So, here’s an example. I have a library in the package HTTP . I

  • 0

So, here’s an example. I have a library in the package HTTP. I define sub-sections of the library in e.g. the package HTTP.TCPProtocol. Now I want to use TCPProtocol from the HTTP package, which means I have to make the TCPProtocol functionality public. At the same time, this functionality should not be exported to users of the library.

How do I do this? I don’t want to shove my whole library into one package, as I feel the separate sub-packages really make the code more structured and navigation easier in eclipse. But browsing around, I couldn’t find a method to expose functions within my project, but not export them outside my project.

EDIT: In light of me being able to come up with a better example, I’m updating the OP.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T07:07:59+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 7:07 am

    Check the caller’s class to lock out all unwanted callers. The caller’s class can be obtained from the stacktrace. In the example below, only instances of Bar will trigger the system.out.println, all all other will get an exception. You can even do package-level checks this way. Make sure that all allowed caller classes methods are not public, or they can call the doSomething method indirectly. You can even do deeper checks, by inspecting the stacktrace further.

    Be aware though, that a skilled develper can circumvent anything you try do do in this matter. No solution is really “secure”.

    package one.two;
    
    import one.Bar;
    
    public class Foo {
    
        public void doSomething() {
    
            StackTraceElement[] stackTrace = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
            StackTraceElement stackTraceElement = stackTrace[2];
            String className = stackTraceElement.getClassName();
    
            if (Bar.class.getName().equals(className)) {
                System.out.println("jay!");
            } else {
                throw new RuntimeException("not allowed");
            }
    
        }
    }
    

    package one;
    
    import one.two.Foo;
    
    public class Bar {
    
        void makeCall() {
            new Foo().doSomething();
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            new Bar().makeCall();
        }
    
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's my Manifest: <?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?> <manifest xmlns:android=http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android package=com.mappp.mobile android:versionCode=1 android:versionName=1.0 > <supports-screens android:largeScreens=true
Here is an example: I have the generic type called Account. I wish to
Here's a piece of code I copied from http://www.schillmania.com/content/projects/javascript-animation-1/demo/ Very simple JS animation: function
Here is my code...I have two dimensional matrices A,B. I want to develop the
Here an example of my checkbox list http://jsfiddle.net/YnM2f/ Let's say I check on G
Here the problem. I have an ItemsControl , and I want to show a
Here's my code in the <head></head> : <link rel=stylesheet href=http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.1.0/jquery.mobile-1.1.0.min.css /> <script type=text/javascript src=http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.1.min.js></script>
Here is the code in a function I'm trying to revise. This example works
Here is the Javascript I currently have <script type=text/javascript> $(function() { $('.slideshow').hover( function() {
Here is the script I'm using, copied directly from Google: <script type=text/javascript> var _gaq

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.