Home/ Questions/Q 8317161
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-08T21:31:43+00:00

Support seems to be different across browsers.. Check the link Firefox: Black with white

  • 0

Support seems to be different across browsers..

Check the link

Firefox: Black with white text.

Opera, Chrome, IE9: Blue with black text.

Which is correct and how would I make it consistent?

The code

@media screen and (min-width: 480px) {

    body{
        background-color:#6aa6cc;
        color:#000;    
    }

    @media screen and (min-width: 768px) {

        body{
            background-color:#000;
            color:#fff;    
        }
    }
}

​

Interestingly enough it appears that nesting media queries within a conditional @import does seem to work.

e.g:

Index.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="utf-8" />
    <title>Media test</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="importer.css" />
</head>
<body>
    <h1>Why is this not consistent.</h1>
</body>
</html>

importer.css

@import url(media.css) screen and (min-width: 480px);

media.css

body {
    background-color: #6aa6cc;
    color: #000;
}

@media screen and (min-width:768px) {
    body {
        background-color: #000;
        color: #fff;
    }
}
Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    For those simply looking for an answer to "Which browsers support nesting of @media rules?", the short answer is that all modern browsers, including Firefox, Safari, Chrome (and its derivatives), and Microsoft Edge, now support nesting of @media at-rules as described in CSS Conditional 3. The code in the question with the nested @media at-rules should now work correctly everywhere, with the exception of Internet Explorer (which is no longer being updated with new features, meaning no version of IE will ever support this feature).

    This feature did not exist in CSS2.1, since only media types existed at the time which you could simply group with a comma, which explains why support for this was very poor at the time this question was first asked.

    What follows is an analysis of the original question with these historical limitations in mind.

    There’s a bit of terminology confusion that needs clearing up in order for us to understand what exactly is happening.

    The code you have refers to @media rules, and not so much media queries — the media query itself is the component that follows the @media token, whereas the rule is the entire block of code consisting of @media, the media query, and the rules nested within its set of curly braces.

    This may cause confusion among many when it comes to using media queries in CSS, as well as your specific case where a @media rule in an imported stylesheet works correctly even when the @import is accompanied by another media query. Notice that media queries can occur in both @media and @import rules. They’re the same thing, but they’re being used to restrictively apply style rules in different ways.

    Now, the actual issue here is that nested @media rules are not valid in CSS2.1 because you’re not allowed to nest any at-rules within @media rules. However, things seem quite different in CSS3. Namely, the Conditional Rules module states very clearly that @media rules can be nested, even providing an example:

    For example, with this set of nested rules:

    @media print { /* rule (1) */
  /* hide navigation controls when printing */
  #navigation { display: none }
  @media (max-width: 12cm) { /* rule (2) */
    /* keep notes in flow when printing to narrow pages */
    .note { float: none }
  }
}

    the condition of the rule marked (1) is true for print media, and the condition of the rule marked (2) is true when the width of the display area (which for print media is the page box) is less than or equal to 12cm. Thus the rule ‘#navigation { display: none }’ applies whenever this style sheet is applied to print media, and the rule ‘.note { float: none }’ is applied only when the style sheet is applied to print media and the width of the page box is less than or equal to 12 centimeters.

    Furthermore, it looks like Firefox is following this specification and processing the rules accordingly, whereas the other browsers are still treating it the CSS2.1 way.

    The grammar in the Syntax module hasn’t been updated to reflect this yet, though; it still disallows nesting of at-rules within @media rules as with CSS2.1. This specification is slated for a rewrite anyway, so I guess this doesn’t matter.

    Basically, CSS3 allows it (pending rewriting the Syntax module), but not CSS2.1 (because it neither defines media queries nor allows nested @media rule blocks). And while at least one browser has begun supporting the new spec, I wouldn’t call other browsers buggy; instead, I’ll say that they simply haven’t caught up yet as they’re really conforming to an older, more stable spec.

    Lastly, the reason why your @import works is because @import is able to work conditionally with the help of a media query. However this has no relation to the @media rule in your imported stylesheet. These are in fact two separate things, and are treated as such by all browsers.

    To make your code work consistently across browsers, you can either use your @import statement, or, since both of your rules use min-width, simply remove the nesting of your @media rules:

    @media screen and (min-width: 480px) {
    body {
        background-color: #6aa6cc;
        color: #000;
    }
}

@media screen and (min-width: 768px) {
    body {
        background-color: #000;
        color: #fff;
    }
}
    • 0