Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 947997
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:10:14+00:00 2026-05-15T23:10:14+00:00

The global new and delete can be used like normal, but you can also

  • 0

The global new and delete can be used like normal, but you can also prefix the :: operator to them and it will work the same.
Are there any other keywords that have this same behaviour?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:10:15+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:10 pm

    Yes, you can also scope operator keyword, like ::operator+(a, b).

    I believe new, delete and operator are the only ones in standard C++ that allow this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've overloaded the global operator new/delete/new[]/delete[] but simple tests show that while my versions
I would like to replace the global operator new() and operator delete() (along with
Which library has the definition for the global new and the delete operator? Specifically
Possible Duplicate: Any reason to overload global new and delete? In c++ you can
I am trying to replace the global operator new and delete. In Linux this
I can override global operator new with different parameters, so for example I can
I have registered a component like this in my Global.asax.cs: ContainerBuilder builder = new
According to this reference for operator new : Global dynamic storage operator functions are
Wikipedia states: A type can be made impossible to allocate with operator new: struct
I enjoy using the operators new and delete in C++ a lot but often

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.