Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8217013
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T12:20:08+00:00 2026-06-07T12:20:08+00:00

This is (yet) a(nother) follow up to James’ answer to this question: Flattening iterator

  • 0

This is (yet) a(nother) follow up to James’ answer to this question: Flattening iterator

How do I alter the flattenig_iterator such that it works recursively? Say I have more levels of nested containers and I don’t want to be limited to a given nesting depth. I.e. flattening_iterator should work with

std::vector< std::vector < std::vector < int > > >

as well as with

std::vector< std::vector < std::vector < std::vector < int > > > >

In my actual code I have an array of objects which might or not contain such an array themselves.

edit:

After playing around with different ways of iterating through different kind of nested containers I learned something that might be interesting to others as well:

Accessing the container elements with nested loops executed 5 to 6 times faster than with the iterator solution.

Pros:

  • elements can be complex objects, e.g. (like in my case) classes that contain containers.
  • faster execution

Cons:

  • Each container structure requires a new implementation of the loop
  • standard library algorithms are not available

Other pros and cons?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T12:20:11+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 12:20 pm

    Ok, so this isn’t a full solution – but I ran out of time. So this currently implements not a full iterator but a cut down iterator-like class which defines something like this interface, and requires C++11. I’ve tested it on g++4.7:

    template<typename NestedContainerType, typename Terminator>
    class flatten_iterator
    {
        bool complete();
        void advance();
        Terminator& current();
    };
    

    Where NestedContainerType is the nested container type (surprisingly), and Terminator is the type of the innermost thing that you’re wanting to get out of the flatten.

    The code below works, but this is certainly not extensively tested. Wrapping it up fully (assuming you’re happy with forward advance only) shouldn’t be too much work, in particular if you use boost::iterator_facade.

    #include <list>
    #include <deque>
    #include <vector>
    
    #include <iostream>
    
    template<typename ContainerType, typename Terminator>
    class flatten_iterator
    {
    public:
        typedef flatten_iterator<typename ContainerType::value_type, Terminator> inner_it_type;
        typedef typename inner_it_type::value_type value_type;
    
        flatten_iterator() {}
        
        flatten_iterator( ContainerType& container ) : m_it( container.begin() ), m_end( container.end() )
        {
            skipEmpties();
        }
        
        bool complete()
        {
            return m_it == m_end;
        }
        
        value_type& current()
        {
            return m_inner_it.current();
        }
        
        void advance()
        {
            if ( !m_inner_it.complete() )
            {
                m_inner_it.advance();
            }
            if ( m_inner_it.complete() )
            {
                ++m_it;
                skipEmpties();
            }
        }
        
    private:
        void skipEmpties()
        {
            while ( !complete() )
            {
                m_inner_it = inner_it_type(*m_it);
                if ( !m_inner_it.complete() ) break;
                ++m_it;
            }
        }
    
    private:
        inner_it_type                    m_inner_it;
        typename ContainerType::iterator m_it, m_end;
    };
    
    
    template<template<typename, typename ...> class ContainerType, typename Terminator, typename ... Args>
    class flatten_iterator<ContainerType<Terminator, Args...>, Terminator>
    {
    public:
        typedef typename ContainerType<Terminator, Args...>::value_type value_type;
        
    public:
        flatten_iterator() {}
        
        flatten_iterator( ContainerType<Terminator, Args...>& container ) :
            m_it( container.begin() ), m_end( container.end() )
        {
        }
        
        bool complete()
        {
            return m_it == m_end;
        }
        
        value_type& current() { return *m_it; }
        void advance() { ++m_it; }
        
    private:
        typename ContainerType<Terminator, Args...>::iterator m_it, m_end;
    };
    

    And with the following test cases, it does what you would expect:

    int main( int argc, char* argv[] )
    {   
        typedef std::vector<int> n1_t;
        typedef std::vector<std::deque<short> > n2_t;
        typedef std::list<std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double> > > > n4_t;
        typedef std::vector<std::deque<std::vector<std::deque<std::vector<std::list<float> > > > > > n6_t;
        
        n1_t n1 = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
        n2_t n2 = { {}, { 1, 2 }, {3}, {}, {4}, {}, {} };
        n4_t n4 = { { { {1.0}, {},  {}, {2.0}, {} }, { {}, {} }, { {3.0} } }, { { { 4.0 } } } };
        n6_t n6 = { { { { { {1.0f}, {},  {}, {2.0f}, {} }, { {}, {} }, { {3.0f} } }, { { { 4.0f } } } } } };
        
        flatten_iterator<n1_t, int> i1( n1 );
        while ( !i1.complete() )
        {
            std::cout << i1.current() << std::endl;
            i1.advance();
        }
        
        flatten_iterator<n2_t, short> i2( n2 );
        while ( !i2.complete() )
        {
            std::cout << i2.current() << std::endl;
            i2.advance();
        }
        
        flatten_iterator<n4_t, double> i4( n4 );
        while ( !i4.complete() )
        {
            std::cout << i4.current() << std::endl;
            i4.advance();
        }
        
        flatten_iterator<n6_t, float> i6( n6 );
        while ( !i6.complete() )
        {
            std::cout << i6.current() << std::endl;
            i6.advance();
        }
    }
    

    So prints the following for each of the container types:

    1
    2
    3
    4
    

    Note that it doesn’t yet work with sets because there’s some foo required to deal with the fact that set iterators return const references. Exercise for the reader… 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I don't have much experience in this yet but the high level question that
Please do not mark it as a dupe of this question just yet: Bold
This is a simple question yet I was unable to find any information at
I haven't found a good answer to this yet. How can I get my
I haven't found a definite answer to this yet. Lots of apps let you
This question has been asked before but 1) the user never accepted an answer
I've looked around a bit and haven't found an answer to this yet. I
I haven't actually done this yet, and maybe I don't need to, but it
Hey I know there are already a few posts about this - yet I
This is yet one more of those how to switch from running with a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.