Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5849393
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T12:59:35+00:00 2026-05-22T12:59:35+00:00

try { } catch() {} finally { try { } catch() { } finally

  • 0
 try {
 } catch() {}
 finally {
     try {
     } catch() { }
     finally { }
 }

Is it good to have the code like above?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T12:59:36+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:59 pm

    Yes, you can do this.

    Actually, you are even required to do it when dealing with streams you want to close properly:

    InputStream in = /* ... */;
    try {
    } catch (...) {
    } finally {
        try {
            in.close();
        } catch (...) {
        } finally {
        }
    }
    

    I don’t see any case in which this would be a bad practice

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm bored with surrounding code with try catch like this.. try { //some boring
Is it good practice to have more than one try{} catch{} statement per method?
Today, in my C++ multi-platform code, I have a try-catch around every function. In
I'm Java beginner, but I thought that when using try-catch-finally I don't have to
Syntax aside, what is the difference between try { } catch() { } finally
So, I know that try/catch does add some overhead and therefore isn't a good
I have encapsulated a backup database command in a Try/Catch and it appears that
I used to close an open datareader using the try/catch/finally block: Dim dr As
This is a followup question to this Should I stick with the Try/Catch/Finally construct,
Short of inserting a try/catch block in each worker thread method, is there a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.