Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5992705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T23:34:16+00:00 2026-05-22T23:34:16+00:00

Until like one hour ago, I was convinced that in python Foo ().bar ()

  • 0

Until like one hour ago, I was convinced that in python Foo ().bar () was nothing more than a short hand for Foo.bar (Foo () ) which passes the instance as first parameter. In this example the last two lines do (apparently) the same thing:

class Foo (object):
    def bar (self): print "baz"

qux = Foo ()
qux.bar ()
Foo.bar (qux)

But now I have a class Animal that has a static method populate() that returns a list of all animals known to man. Also each instance of Animal has a method populate() that fills the properties of the instance with random values.

#! /usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

import random

animals = [ ("Bella", "cow"), ("Spike", "dog"), ("José", "iguana"), ("Tux", "penguin") ]

class Animal (object):
    @staticmethod
    def populate (*args): return map (lambda x: Animal (*x), animals)

    def __init__ (self, name = None, species = None):
        def bar (): self.name, self.species = random.choice (animals)
        self.name = name
        self.species = species
        self.populate = bar

    def __repr__ (self): return "%s of species %s" % (self.name, self.species)

print Animal.populate ()
print Animal ("Pinky", "mouse")
qux = Animal ()
qux.populate ()
print qux

The code works fine, but what made me suspicious was the fact that print Animal.populate (qux) called the static populate method (and hence returned a list and did not populate poor qux). So apparently my conviction that Foo ().bar () was nothing more than a short hand for Foo.bar (Foo () ) is wrong.

This raises various questions for me:

  1. What happens when I call Foo ().bar ()?
  2. What happens when I call Foo.bar (Foo () )?
  3. Is there an internal difference between the both?
  4. Am I missing some fundamental concept of python?
  5. If you had to write a class whose static populate method does something else than the populate method invoked over an instance of this class, which would be the way to go?

(Yes it must be the same name.)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T23:34:16+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 11:34 pm

    On the difference between Foo().bar(), Foo.bar(Foo()) and Foo.bar() (as an answer because I signed up yesterday and can’t post comments yet) – this is because of Python(<3.0)’s concept of ‘bound’ and ‘unbound’ methods – it strictly requires that, except with @staticmethod or @classmethod, method calls have an instance associated with them. There’s not really any easier way to explain it than just something you have to remember.
    Thankfully, this has changed in Python 3 – the concept of ‘bound’ and ‘unbound’ methods as separate things has gone, and Foo.bar() works just fine for your example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.