Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6118557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T15:27:01+00:00 2026-05-23T15:27:01+00:00

Using the below construct you can have private variables, public & private functions. So

  • 0

Using the below construct you can have private variables, public & private functions. So why have all the various ways to create a namespace ?

Is the NameSpace that radically different than a function with associated behavior & scope ?

I see the point of not polluting the global namespace e.g. window object in browsers with the plethora of functions one would create, but that can be achieved by the below as well..

Seems I’m missing a fundamental point..

// Constructor for customObject  
function customObject(aArg, bArg, cArg)  
{  
    // Instance variables are defined by this  
    this.a = aArg;  
    this.b = bArg;  
    this.c = cArg;  
}  

// private instance function  
customObject.prototype.instanceFunctionAddAll = function()  
{  
    return (this.a + this.b + this.c);  
}  

/*  
  Create a "static" function for customObject.  
  This can be called like so : customObject.staticFunction  
*/  
customObject.staticFunction = function()  
{  
    console.log("Called a static function");  
}  

// Test customObject  
var test = new customObject(10, 20, 30);  
var retVal = test.instanceFunctionAddAll();  
customObject.staticFunction();  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T15:27:02+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:27 pm

    The point is that you might have more than one function, but you only want to pollute the global scope with a single variable (the “namespace”).

    // Wrap in a immediately-executing anonymous function to avoid polluting
    // the global namespace unless we explicitly set properties of window.
    (function () {
        function CustomObject(/*...*/) { /*...*/ } 
        // Add methods, static methods, etc. for CustomObject.
    
        function CustomObject2(/*...*/) { /*...*/ } 
        // Add methods, static methods, etc. for CustomObject2.
    
        var CONSTANT_KINDA = "JavaScript doesn't really have constants";
    
        // Create a namespace, explicitly polluting the global scope,
        // that allows access to all our variables local to this anonymous function
        window.namespace = {
            CustomObject: CustomObject,
            CustomObject2: CustomObject2,
            CONSTANT_KINDA: CONSTANT_KINDA
        };
    }());
    

    Also, Felix is right, your “private” instance function is actually very public. See Crockford’s “Private Members in JavaScript” if you want actual private methods.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As of now I'm using below line to print with out dot's fprintf( stdout,
Using the code below, I am returning an nvarchar field from MS SQL 2005
I am using the program below to sort and eventually print out email messages.
I am using the code below to save and restore the window position and
I've been using the idiom below for some time now. And it seems to
How would I handle something like the below uri using ASP.NET MVC's routing capability:
I want to submit a with using jquery as below; $(#formid).submit(); Its working perfect
I am using the code snippet below, however it's not working quite as I
In my example below I'm using a dijit.form.DateTextBox : <input type=text name=startDate dojoType=dijit.form.DateTextBox constraints={datePattern:'MM/dd/yyyy'}
In the code below I am using a recursive CTE(Common Table Expression) in SQL

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.