Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8347963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T07:32:36+00:00 2026-06-09T07:32:36+00:00

Usually this isn’t important, and it may not even be too important for my

  • 0

Usually this isn’t important, and it may not even be too important for my situation, but I’d like to know if there is a reasonable way to implement this.

My page automatically opens a web socket connection. In order to be a better client I want the client to clean up after itself and close the websocket before the page gets unloaded.

My hope is that the browser would have the foresight to call close() for me when the page is unloaded, but in case it doesn’t, how can I leverage the onbeforeunload message (or some such) to do some “final cleanup” (not unlike atexit() in C)?

Suppose I have some system where I want my clients to send an “exiting” message to my websocket server for some reason.

I can do this now:

$(window).on('beforeunload', function () {
    websocket.close(); // websocket is a WebSocket
});

But suppose close() is actually an asynchronous call (is it?) and I want to make sure the socket.onclose callback fires prior to actually unloading the page! Can this be done?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T07:32:37+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 7:32 am

    There is no sure fire way of making sure an asynchronous call is fully executed in modern browsers. Older versions could be held up with a while loop, but current browsers will kill any process and continue. Reason is they want the user experience to be fast, you holding them up does them harm.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know this isn't strictly a programming question but y'all must have experienced this.
With Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getScreenSize() I get the screen size. But usually this isn't the available size
I have been seeing code like this usually in the start of header files:
Using jQuery on() version 1.7. I bind my events usually like this: $(.foo).on(click, function()
I know this isn't exactly how the pickle module was intended to be used,
I suppose this isn't a huge deal, since there are other way around this
I know about the double margin bug, but this is different.. the scenario is
In winforms I usually do Parent.Controls.Remove(this); to have a UserControl remove itself. This isn't
I'm using node.js but I have a feeling this isn't necessarily related to just
I'd like to apologize in advance, because this is not a very good question.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.