Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 210741
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:01:57+00:00 2026-05-11T18:01:57+00:00

What if I have a class that both extends an abstract class and implements

  • 0

What if I have a class that both extends an abstract class and implements an interface, for example:

class Example : AbstractExample, ExampleInterface
{
    // class content here
}

How can I initialize this class so I can access methods from both the interface and the abstract class?

When I do:

AbstractExample example = new Example();

I cannot access methods from the interface.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:01:57+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:01 pm

    The last example will tie you to a solid instance of either the interface or abstract class which I presume is not your goal.The bad news is you’re NOT in a dynamically typed language here, so your stuck with either having a reference to a solid “Example” objects as previously sprcified or casting/uncasting i.e:

    AbstractExample example = new Example();
    ((IExampleInterface)example).DoSomeMethodDefinedInInterface();
    

    Your other alternitives are to have both AbstractExample and IExampleInterface implement a common interface so you would have i.e.

    abstract class AbstractExample : ICommonInterface
    interface IExampleInterface : ICommonInterface
    class Example : AbstractExample, IExampleInterface
    

    Now you could work with ICommonInterface and have the functionality of both the abstract class and the implementation of your IExample interface.

    If none of these answers are acceptable, you may want to look at some of the DLR languages that run under the .NET framework i.e. IronPython.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that neither a abstract class nor an interface can contain a method
I have a generic list class that implements a particular interface. The list items
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate
I have one class called HyperlinkEventMonitor that implements a HyperlinkListener. I want to extend
For example, I have a class that has two strings, one of which must
I have a problem implementing this example in java, tableFilterDemo is a class that
I have a class that I want to use to store properties for another
I have a class that map objects to objects, but unlike dictionary it maps
I have a class that I wish to expose as a remote service using
I have a class that looks like this public class SomeClass { public SomeChildClass[]

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.