Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8344025
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T06:14:29+00:00 2026-06-09T06:14:29+00:00

What is a good way to represent the type LoL a , being a

  • 0

What is a good way to represent the type LoL a, being a list of lists
of … of a? The nesting level is arbitrary, but uniform over all
elements of the outer list.

The case I have in mind is to apply a grouping on the members of a
list, and then to apply a next grouping on each subgroup, and so on. It
is not known up front how many groupings one will have to apply. Hence:

rGroupBy :: [(a -> a -> Bool)] -> [a] -> [...[a]...]

Extra brownie points for the type signature of rGroupBy 😉

Example:

Suppose deweyGroup i groups the elements based on the i-th number

rGroupBy [deweyGroup 1, deweyGroup 2] 
         ["1.1", "1.2.1", "1.2.2", "2.1", "2.2", "3"]

gives:

[ [ [ "1.1" ], [ "1.2.1", "1.2.2" ] ],
  [ [ "2.1" ], [ "2.2" ] ],
  [ [ "3" ] ]
]

Postscript

One day later, we have 4 excellent and complementary solutions. I’m very pleased with the answers; thank you all.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T06:14:31+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 6:14 am

    I believe the following example should be close to what you had in mind. First we declare type-level natural numbers. Then we define vectors, which carry their length as a phantom type (see Fixed-length vectors in Haskell, Part 1: Using GADTs). And then we define a structure for nested lists of lists of … which carries the depth as a phantom type. Finally we can define correctly typed rGroupBy.

    {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
    {-# LANGUAGE EmptyDataDecls #-}
    
    import Data.List (groupBy)
    
    data Zero
    data Succ n
    
    data Vec n a where
        Nil  ::                 Vec Zero a
        Cons :: a -> Vec n a -> Vec (Succ n) a
    
    data LList n a where
        Singleton :: a           -> LList Zero a
        SuccList  :: [LList n a] -> LList (Succ n) a
    
    -- Not very efficient, but enough for this example.
    instance Show a => Show (LList n a) where
        showsPrec _ (Singleton x)   = shows x
        showsPrec _ (SuccList lls)  = shows lls
    
    rGroupBy :: Vec n (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> LList (Succ n) a
    rGroupBy Nil
        = SuccList . map Singleton
    rGroupBy (Cons f fs)
        = SuccList . map (rGroupBy fs) . groupBy f
    
    -- TEST ------------------------------------------------------------
    
    main = do
        let input = ["1.1", "1.2.1", "1.2.2", "2.1", "2.2", "3"]
    
        -- don't split anything
        print $ rGroupBy Nil input
        -- split on 2 levels
        print $ rGroupBy (Cons (deweyGroup 1) 
                               (Cons (deweyGroup 2) Nil))
                   input 
      where
        deweyGroup :: Int -> String -> String -> Bool
        deweyGroup i a b = a!!idx == b!!idx where idx = 2*(i-1)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is a good way to represent finite automaton in Haskell? How would the
What is a good way to represent a collection of bits? I have a
What is a good way to represent sparse set of integers (really C memory
WebApplicationInitializer provides a way to programmatically represent a good portion of a standard web.xml
What is a good way to arrange images in the footer as shown in
Wondering what the best / good way of doing this would be in jQuery.
Question What is a good way of assigning a default value to an optional
Anyone knows a good way to use http live streaming tools on non-Mac platforms?
What is a good way of writing something like this in one line. The
Is there a good way to keep keys from conflicting when using the Microsoft

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.