Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What is the difference between running a Java application withjava -cp CLASSPATH and java -jar JAR_FILE_PATH? Is one of them preferred to the other for running a Java application? I mean which one of these ways is more expensive for JVM (according to their machine resources usage)?
Which one will cause JVM to spawn more threads while trying to run the application?
I prefer the first version to start a java application just because it has less pitfalls (“welcome to classpath hell”). The second one requires an executable jar file and the classpath for that application has to be defined inside the jar’s manifest (all other classpath declaration will be silently ignored…). So with the second version you’d have to look into the jar, read the manifest and try to find out if the classpath entries are valid from where the jar is stored… That’s avoidable.
I don’t expect any performance advantages or disadvantages for either version. It’s just telling the jvm which class to use for the main thread and where it can find the libraries.