Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8312019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T20:00:59+00:00 2026-06-08T20:00:59+00:00

What mechanisms exist already for designing a P2P architecture, in which the different nodes

  • 0

What mechanisms exist already for designing a P2P architecture, in which the different nodes do work separately, in order to split a task (say distributed rendering of a 3D image), but unlike torrents, they don’t get to see, or hijack the contents of the packets being transmitted? Only the original task requester is entitled to view the? results of the complete task.

Any working implementations on that principle already?

EDIT: Maybe I formulated the question wrongly. The idea is that even when they are able to work on the contents of the separate packets being sent, the separate nodes never get the chance to assemble the whole picture. Only the one requesting the task is supposed to do this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T20:01:01+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 8:01 pm

    If you have direct P2P connections (no “promiscuous” or “multicasting” sort of mode), the receiving peers should only “see” the data sent to them, nothing else.

    If you have relay servers on the way and you are worried that they can sniff the data, I believe encryption is the way to go.

    What we do is that peer A transmits data to peer B in an S/MIME envelope: the content is signed with the Private Key of Peer A and encrypted with the public Key of Peer B.

    Only peer B can decrypt the data and is guaranteed that peer A actually sent the data.

    This whole process is costly CPU and byte wise and may not be appropriate for your application. It also requires some form of key management infrastructure: peers need to subscribe to a community which issues certificates for instance.

    But the basic idea is there: asymetric encryption with a key or shared secret encryption.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When trying to work with Qt's signal/slot mechanisms over more than one level of
I am trying to implement web services that use different security mechanisms to do
I'm attempting to expose a single API call using three different authentication mechanisms: django's
I am wondering what other simple-to-use caching mechanisms exist for PHP, except APC cache,
What mechanisms exist, if any, to protect a user's privacy and data for web
I’m looking for some feedback on mechanisms to batch data from MySQL Community Server
POSIX.1e was going to define ACL ( Access Control List ) mechanisms for POSIX
I'm trying to understand whether subversion has its own mechanisms for regulating concurrent user
I am working on an application that uses Oracle's built in authentication mechanisms to
I would like to create a caching system that will bypass some mechanisms in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.