Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What should be the correct interpretation for the sizes of each bit represents :
Bitmap attribue length in bytes 1 b 1 16 (every two, representing a binary byte) 52 b 64 ??? 64 b 64 ??? 65 b 1 ??? (will be 16 too ?) 96 b 64 ??? 128 b 64 ???
Need to implement the treatment for this information.
Tanks.
The docs for all fields is e.g. here. 1 is “Bit Map Extended”, 52 is “Personal Identification number data”, 64 is “Message authentication code (MAC)”, 65 is “Bit map, tertiary”, and so on (though the lengths are not as you give them — see the same Wikipedia page I’ve already pointed to, it’s quite informative).
If you need the authoritative reference, you’ll need to splurge 252 Swiss Francs to ISO for a PDF or paper copy of the official standard, of course.