Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8353421
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T09:15:14+00:00 2026-06-09T09:15:14+00:00

When I use this: int** newData = new int*[100]; I get array of 100

  • 0

When I use this:

int** newData = new int*[100];

I get array of 100 objects (pointers) and default constructor is called on them, it causes pointers to be NULL.

If this is critical part of code and I want to avoid the nullification of the array, can I avoid it in a nice way? (without using malloc)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T09:15:16+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 9:15 am

    This is a quality of implementation issue. The pointers are not guaranteed to be initialized in the code that you have shown. There is no other way of dynamically allocating an an array of pointers in C++ that is guaranteed to be more performing.

    (Pointers don’t have constructors, they are either initialized or left uninitialized.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can I use default arguments in a constructor like this maybe Soldier(int entyID, int
I want to use LINQ to convert this IEnumerable<int>[] value1ByType = new IEnumerable<int>[3]; value1ByType[0]=
Say I have a dynamic array like: int* integers = new int[100]; Is there
I've decided to use this.variableName when referring to string/int etc.. fields. Would that include
Simple. If I use: public void Add(params int[] values) Then I can use this
While I use iterator like this , //include header files using namespace std; int
If I use INT(12) vs INT(10) or INT(8) what will this actually do in
I use operator() as a subscript operator this way: double CVector::operator() (int i) const
This is my c++ struct (Use Multi-Byte Character Set) typedef struct hookCONFIG { int
Why when i use this: int a = 1; methodWithParamString(a + ); a is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.