Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8296947
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T15:13:09+00:00 2026-06-08T15:13:09+00:00

While looking into Can you have a incrementor and a decrementor on the same

  • 0

While looking into Can you have a incrementor and a decrementor on the same variable in the same statement in c

I discovered that you can have several prefix increment/decrement operators on a single variable, but only one postfix

ex:

++--++foo; // valid
foo++--++; // invalid
--foo++;   // invalid

Why is this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T15:13:12+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:13 pm

    This is due to the fact that in C++ (but not C), the result of ++x is a lValue, meaning it is assignable, and thus chain-able.

    However, the result of x++ is NOT an lValue, instead it is a prValue, meaning it cannot be assigned to, and thus cannot be chained.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been looking into this for a while and can't figure it out.
I have been looking into a memory leak issue for a while. I found
While looking into parallel programming, and subsequently evaluation strategies, the question whether thunks are
I started looking into PhoneGap yesterday and created a simple marble rolling around while
I've been looking into OSGi for a while and I'm wondering about the best
I've been looking into this for a while now. I'm trying to put a
http://github.com/gabriel/yajl-objc I've already tried SBJSON, and while it works, I'm looking into alternative options
I've spent today looking into lockless queues. I have a multiple producer, multiple consumer
I'm currently looking into possible ways we can refactor our codebase, to make it
I just started looking into SQLite for the iPhone SDK. I have been looking

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.