Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8291543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T13:09:54+00:00 2026-06-08T13:09:54+00:00

While trying to write a tiny, obfuscated type checker, an unacceptable code pattern was

  • 0

While trying to write a tiny, obfuscated type checker, an unacceptable code pattern was discovered. However, it inconsistently fails to work properly. This is the code that was initally written to test it with.

def statictypes(a):
    def b(a, b, c):
        if b in a and not isinstance(c, a[b]): raise TypeError('{} should be {}, not {}'.format(b, a[b], type(c)))
        return c
    return __import__('functools').wraps(a)(lambda *c: b(a.__annotations__, 'return', a(*(b(a.__annotations__, *d) for d in zip(a.__code__.co_varnames, c)))))

@statictypes
def isallinstance(iterable: object, class_or_type_or_tuple: (type, tuple)) -> bool:
    """isallinstance(iterable, class_or_type_or_tuple) -> bool

    Return whether all items in an iterable are instances of a class or of a
    subclass thereof. With a type as second argument, return whether that is
    all items' type. The form using a tuple, isallinstance(x, (A, B, ...)),
    is a shortcut for any(isallinstance(x, y) for y in (A, B, ...)).
    """
    return all(isinstance(item, class_or_type_or_tuple) for item in iterable)

The following shows a conversation with Python’s interpreter and highlights the error that comes up. A TypeError is generated, but not the one that was expected. While generators were fine, now they fail.

>>> isallinstance(range(1000000), int)
True
>>> isallinstance(range(1000000), (int, float))
True
>>> isallinstance(range(1000000), [int, float])
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#26>", line 1, in <module>
    isallinstance(range(1000000), [int, float])
  File "C:\Users\schappell\Downloads\test.py", line 5, in <lambda>
    return __import__('functools').wraps(a)(lambda *c: b(a.__annotations__, 'return', a(*(b(a.__annotations__, *d) for d in zip(a.__code__.co_varnames, c)))))
TypeError: isallinstance() argument after * must be a sequence, not generator

The statictypes function can be rewritten, and the isallinstance function redefined and wrapped. The simplest solution is to rewrite the generatior in statictypes to be a list comprehension.

def statictypes(a):
    def b(a, b, c):
        if b in a and not isinstance(c, a[b]): raise TypeError('{} should be {}, not {}'.format(b, a[b], type(c)))
        return c
    return __import__('functools').wraps(a)(lambda *c: b(a.__annotations__, 'return', a(*[b(a.__annotations__, *d) for d in zip(a.__code__.co_varnames, c)])))

After that, the isallinstance will starting working as expected once it is recreated from scratch. The TypeError stating what was wrong with the second argument is properly generated as was desired.

>>> isallinstance(range(1000000), int)
True
>>> isallinstance(range(1000000), (int, float))
True
>>> isallinstance(range(1000000), [int, float])
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#29>", line 1, in <module>
    isallinstance(range(1000000), [int, float])
  File "C:\Users\schappell\Downloads\test.py", line 5, in <lambda>
    return __import__('functools').wraps(a)(lambda *c: b(a.__annotations__, 'return', a(*[b(a.__annotations__, *d) for d in zip(a.__code__.co_varnames, c)])))
  File "C:\Users\schappell\Downloads\test.py", line 5, in <listcomp>
    return __import__('functools').wraps(a)(lambda *c: b(a.__annotations__, 'return', a(*[b(a.__annotations__, *d) for d in zip(a.__code__.co_varnames, c)])))
  File "C:\Users\schappell\Downloads\test.py", line 3, in b
    if b in a and not isinstance(c, a[b]): raise TypeError('{} should be {}, not {}'.format(b, a[b], type(c)))
TypeError: class_or_type_or_tuple should be (<class 'type'>, <class 'tuple'>), not <class 'list'>

Questions:

  1. Why does the first function with the generator somtimes work and other times fail?
  2. Why is a generator not considered a sequence (since it generates a sequence)?
  3. Why is a sequence needed when a generator obviously works some of the time?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T13:09:57+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 1:09 pm
    1. Because isinstance, like a couple of other screwy standard library functions, does a different thing when you give it a tuple than other sequences. Namely, it works, and checks that the type is any of the ones given.
    2. Because it isn’t. See the sequence protocol definition. It’d need to implement __getitem__ to be one.
    3. A bug, which still hasn’t been merged, which is telling you that your generator is broken, but with the incorrect error message.

    Also, please don’t dirty our lovely language with type checking like this for anything but good reasons :).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today, while I was trying to write code to just add and subtract the
While trying to write code which returns 24 hours less than a given time,
While trying to write an answer for another SO question something really peculiar happened.
I'm trying to write for and while loops in Python — functional programming style.
I'm trying to write some html in the Html tab of TinyMCE while editing
I have come up to issues while I'm trying to write some classes, here
While trying to write a custom control I've come across a problem with the
I'm struggling while trying to write generic methods to save and load data from
I've run into some problems while trying to write a smallshell in c. The
I need to generate a report in .xls format, while trying to write the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.