Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 664479
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T23:36:15+00:00 2026-05-13T23:36:15+00:00

1) If we want to create an instance of a given type during runtime

  • 0

1) If we want to create an instance of a given type during runtime ( thus using late binding ), then we need to call Activator.CreateInstance. But wouldn’t it be more efficient if Type class had such a method? If nothing else, Type.CreateInstance could return strongly typed instance instead of System.Object?!

2) Type.GetType enables us to pass into it only the friendly name of the assembly containing the type, thus it doesn’t enable us to specify the absolute path to this assembly.

Any idea why Type.GetType allowing us to specify an absolute path to the assembly would be a bad idea?

thanx

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T23:36:16+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:36 pm

    1) You can, but I’m not sure if these are nicer then using Activator.CreateInstance

    object obj = someType.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes).Invoke(null);
    object obj = someType.InvokeMember("", BindingFlags.CreateInstance, null, null, null);
    

    2) Not using a full Assembly Qualified Name to load a possible unexpected type and can have strange results as explained here.

    Specifying the location to load the assembly from is something only Assembly.LoadFrom does. Assembly.LoadFrom is deprecated in the newer .Net version. The reason for that is when you use LoadFrom you do need to be aware that the assembly is loaded in a different context and unexpected things could happen. So it is a good thing Type.GetType does not has such a feature.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 357k
  • Answers 357k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The other answers are correct. Here is some code you… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you ruin the noConflict concept by reassigning the jquery to… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you get that particular error, you don't actually have… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am

Related Questions

No related questions found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.