Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 353793
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T11:51:48+00:00 2026-05-12T11:51:48+00:00

2^n + 6n^2 + 3n I guess it’s just O(2^n), using the highest order

  • 0

2^n + 6n^2 + 3n

I guess it’s just O(2^n), using the highest order term, but what is the formal approach to go about proving this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T11:51:49+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:51 am

    You can prove that 2^n + n^2 + n = O(2^n) by using limits at infinity. Specifically, f(n) is O(g(n)) if lim (n->inf.) f(n)/g(n) is finite.

    lim (n->inf.) ((2^n + n^2 + n) / 2^n)
    

    Since you have inf/inf, an indeterminate form, you can use L’Hopital’s rule and differentiate the numerator and the denominator until you get something you can work with:

    lim (n->inf.) ((ln(2)*2^n + 2n + 1) / (ln(2)*2^n))
    lim (n->inf.) ((ln(2)*ln(2)*2^n + 2) / (ln(2)*ln(2)*2^n))
    lim (n->inf.) ((ln(2)*ln(2)*ln(2)*2^n) / (ln(2)*ln(2)*ln(2)*2^n))
    

    The limit is 1, so 2^n + n^2 + n is indeed O(2^n).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i guess this is a really simple problem, but i just can't get it
I guess this has been asked before here , but I'm still confused about
I guess the topic says it. I have tried googling this, but havent gotten
I guess this is covered somewhere but I'm not able to find. Guess I'm
I guess you could classify this as a Scrabble style problem, but it started
I guess this is a bit of a noob question but I haven't seen
I guess its just due to my lake of jquery knowledge but ill lay
I guess this have been both asked and answered before, but I don't really
My guess is it just made parsing easier, but I can't see exactly why.
I guess this is not quite a programming question, but it is bothering me

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.