Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4549464
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T16:21:50+00:00 2026-05-21T16:21:50+00:00

8048563: e8 0d 00 00 00 call 8048575 <exit@plt+0x141> I was trying to reverse

  • 0
8048563:       e8 0d 00 00 00          call   8048575 <exit@plt+0x141>

I was trying to reverse engineer a binary for fun and I saw this call in the objdump output. Looking at this line, I thought the call would be to the exit function which was dynamically linked. However, 8048575 seems to be an address in the .text section of this program!

  1. Why does this wrong naming of function happen?
  2. The place where the call lands has the following line; why is the function prologue missing?
8048575:       83 ec 6c                sub    esp,0x6c
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T16:21:51+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 4:21 pm

    That’s not actually a IAT/PLT call, it’s a call to another function in the same file. The file probably has had its internal symbol stripped, and objdump displays all addresses as the last defined symbol before the address + an offset. With no internal symbols, this will hit the last plt-linked function, since the plt section comes before text.

    So, the displayed name is just bogus and can be ignored.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following condensed code: /* Compile: gcc -pthread -m32 -ansi x.c */ #include
I already posted the following Question got a solution and moving forward I am
I'm grabing a list of banks that are a certain distance from a point

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.