Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 768535
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:11:50+00:00 2026-05-14T18:11:50+00:00

A co-worker asked me to change a signature from using a primitive boolean to

  • 0

A co-worker asked me to change a signature from using a primitive “boolean” to using a classed “Boolean”. He didn’t offer a very good explanation why?

Have any of you heard of this and can any of you explain why it matters or doesn’t matter?

Edit: He mentioned that it was good practice for public methods.

The use of the field is just a flag that tells me whether to call one flow or another depending on whether it’s true or false.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:11:51+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:11 pm

    Actually I tend to err on the side of passing small-b boolean instead, because I know that a primitive boolean is never going to be null. I’m sure there are valid reasons for using the Boolean type, but I’d want to think about its use in each case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been asked to convert a legacy app containing some crystal reports from
A co worker of mine asked me to review some of my code and
I have a co-worker that maintains that TRUE used to be defined as 0
I have a co-worker that swears by //in a singleton Constants class public static
I have a worker thread that is listening to a TCP socket for incoming
I have several different c# worker applications that run various continuous tasks: sending emails
I was asked to provide an estimation to change a relatively small app designed
I have an aspnet webapp which has worked very well up until now. I
I recently asked this question and worked out that the reason a single email
A co-worker recently ran into a situation where a query to look up security

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.