Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 77879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:53:58+00:00 2026-05-10T20:53:58+00:00

A common pattern in C++ is to create a class that wraps a lock

  • 0

A common pattern in C++ is to create a class that wraps a lock – the lock is either implicitly taken when object is created, or taken explicitly afterwards. When object goes out of scope, dtor automatically releases the lock. Is it possible to do this in C#? As far as I understand there are no guarantees on when dtor in C# will run after object goes out of scope.

Clarification: Any lock in general, spinlock, ReaderWriterLock, whatever. Calling Dispose myself defeats the purpose of the pattern – to have the lock released as soon as we exit scope – no matter if we called return in the middle, threw exception or whatnot. Also, as far as I understand using will still only queue object for GC, not destroy it immediately…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:53:59+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:53 pm

    Your understanding regarding using is incorrect, this is a way to have scoped actions happen in a deterministic fashion (no queuing to the GC takes place).

    C# supplies the lock keyword which provides an exclusive lock and if you want to have different types (e.g. Read/Write) you’ll have to use the using statement.

    P.S. This thread may interest you.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 109k
  • Answers 109k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well django 1.0 was updated today on Google AppEngine. But… May 11, 2026 at 9:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Since you mention that you want to learn the dark… May 11, 2026 at 9:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Just missing the generic type arguments: public void oIt<T,P>( T… May 11, 2026 at 9:26 pm

Related Questions

Edit: From another question I provided an answer that has links to a lot
Ted Faison in a podcast on event-based software design mentioned that sender and self
different programming languages have different features or lack certain features. Design patterns are a
I'm running into a common pattern in the code that I'm writing, where I

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.