Home/ Questions/Q 163941
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T11:39:21+00:00

A common problem in any language is to assert that parameters sent in to

  • 0

A common problem in any language is to assert that parameters sent in to a method meet your requirements, and if they don’t, to send nice, informative error messages. This kind of code gets repeated over and over, and we often try to create helpers for it. However, in C#, it seems those helpers are forced to deal with some duplication forced upon us by the language and compiler. To show what I mean, let me present some some raw code with no helpers, followed by one possible helper. Then, I’ll point out the duplication in the helper and phrase my question precisely.

First, the code without any helpers:

public void SomeMethod(string firstName, string lastName, int age) {      if(firstName == null)      {           throw new WhateverException('The value for firstName cannot be null.');      }       if(lastName == null)      {           throw new WhateverException('The value for lastName cannot be null.');      }       // Same kind of code for age, making sure it is a reasonable range (< 150, for example).      // You get the idea }

}

Now, the code with a reasonable attempt at a helper:

public void SomeMethod(string firstName, string lastName, int age) {       Helper.Validate( x=> x !=null, 'firstName', firstName);       Helper.Validate( x=> x!= null, 'lastName', lastName); }

The main question is this: Notice how the code has to pass the value of the parameter and the name of the parameter (‘firstName’ and firstName). This is so the error message can say, ‘Blah blah blah the value for the firstName parameter.’ Have you found any way to get around this using reflection or anything else? Or a way to make it less painful?

And more generally, have you found any other ways to streamline this task of validating parameters while reducing code duplication?

EDIT: I’ve read people talking about making use of the Parameters property, but never quite found a way around the duplication. Anyone have luck with that?

Thanks!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

    • 0