Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 86199
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:12:31+00:00 2026-05-10T22:12:31+00:00

A few years ago client Java was unsuitable for web development because a remarkable

  • 0

A few years ago client Java was unsuitable for web development because a remarkable part of web users did not have Java installed. ( I don’t remember exact numbers, more than 10%).

Now I see the Google Analytics stats for a big site and it tells that >98% of users have Java installed.

Is these stats very biased by Javascript usage? As I understand Google Analytics measure only users that has Javascript.

Is the picture similar on other big sites?

Does client Java have really ‘stopper’ drawbacks compared to Flash?

EDIT: I mean java applets mainly, java WebStart seems to be not suitable for average user.
I mention Javascript only to describe the way Google Analytics works.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:12:32+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:12 pm

    When I wrote my diploma project, I had to choose between Flash and Java Applets. Here are some pros and cons:

    Java Applets:

    • [plus] you program in Java, which is mature and stable
    • [plus] you can use the Java GUI frameworks that pack a lot of punch
    • [minus] the first time the user hits the page with the applet, the JVM must be initialized and this can take up to a few minutes even on a fast computer
    • [minus] Applets are not meant to be used as animation media; sure, you can do stuff, but it is like programming in C – you do everything from scratch

    example: i needed to show a data packet as it moved between two routers. The packet must be a control of some sort, like a button or smth. This animation can be defined in 1 line of code in Flash, where all objects derive from some base object that can be animated. I could not find a suitable solution in Java.

    Flash:

    • [plus] really really focused on animations;
    • [plus] ActionScript is actually an OO language
    • [minus] ActionScript is sloppy, bughish and has only a few supporters. If you are stuck, be prepared to search obscure Japanese forums for solutions
    • [minus] ActionSCript may be OO, but it lacks a lot of features, like Enums, fully fledged interfaces, threads (!!!!) etc.
    • [minus] Flash was designed to be used by non-tech people – they just use the authoring tool; I wrote code for everything and it worked, but it was a pain.

    My conclusion:

    I eagerly await a programming paradigm for animations and rich client interfaces.

    ps: Silverlight seems to be a disappointment so far, maybe Microsoft will inject some $ into it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 76k
  • Answers 76k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Windows Workflow Foundation is .NET There are many technologies in… May 11, 2026 at 3:06 pm
  • added an answer I believe you're looking for: info symbol <addresss> Print the… May 11, 2026 at 3:06 pm
  • added an answer I didn't quite catch your question. Do you mean that… May 11, 2026 at 3:06 pm

Related Questions

I have a client that wants to use Filemaker for a few things in
A few years ago, I read a book that described how you could override
A few years ago we started playing around with XForms from the W3C for
A few years ago I developed a web app for which we wanted to

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.