Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7636239
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T07:37:28+00:00 2026-05-31T07:37:28+00:00

A formula with quantifiers contains declaration of trans function. Z3 successfully finds the model

  • 0

A formula with quantifiers contains declaration of trans function. Z3 successfully finds the model and prints it. But it also prints models for functions like trans!1!4464, trans!7!4463 .. which are not used anywhere in the model. What is it? How can I disable this output?

Here is the query: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/444947/asyn_arbiter_bound_16.smt2
and here is Z3’s output – http://dl.dropbox.com/u/444947/asyn_arbiter_bound_16_result.txt

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T07:37:29+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:37 am

    Recall that the models returned by Z3 can be viewed as simple functional programs.
    Your formula is in the UFBV fragment. Z3 uses several modules to decide this fragment. Each module converts a formula F into a “simpler” formula F', and produces a procedure that converts a model for F' into a model for F. We call these procedures: “model converters”. Model converters will, for example, eliminate interpretations for auxiliary functions and constants introduced in the F to F' conversion. Some auxiliary definitions can’t be removed seems they are used to give interpretation of other definitions. We should view them as “auxiliary functions”. They also create an interpretation for symbols that have been eliminated..

    In your example, the following happens: the last module produces a model that contains the trans!... and k!... symbols. This model is for a formula that does not even contain trans. The function trans has been eliminated. As we apply the model converters, the interpretation for trans is constructed based on the interpretation of all trans!.... At this point, trans!... and k!... symbols are still being used since the interpretation of trans has a reference to all trans!... symbols and the interpretation of the trans!... functions have references to the k!... function symbols. At this step, there are no unnecessary symbols in the model. However, in a later step, the interpretation of trans is simplified by unfolding the definitions of trans!... and k!.... So, after this simplification step, trans!... and k!... are essentially “dead code”.

    That being said, the model returned by Z3 is correct, that is, it is a model for your formula. I acknowledge that these extra symbols are annoying and unnecessary. To eliminate them, we have apply the equivalent of a “dead code” elimination step. We are really close to the next release. So, this feature will not be available in the next release, but I will add it for the release following the next one.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to pull all nested quantifiers in a formula to the outermost
I am converting an excel sheet formula to java but I can't understand how
I have a formula like this: =COUNTBLANK(BA3:BA21771)/ROWS(BA3:BA21771) I have columns that extend all the
I have cell formula like C1+C2.suppose i use getcellformula()method it returns the String C1+C2.
I have this formula in a cell: =GetData(Channel_01,Chicago) Which executes this code: Public Function
i have this formula: =IF(COUNTIF(C1:C2577,CertainText)>0, Present,Absent) but i dont want it to search in
I have this formula in a function below. It's a fairly simple concept, yet
What formula would return TRUE if a column contains only cells with value D
I have a formula like this which works fine on Excel/OOCalc applications: =SUMPRODUCT(--($Panels.$A$5:$A$6999=K$80);--($Panels.$B$5:$B$6999=K$81);INDEX($Panels.$C$5:$J$6999;0;MATCH(Voc;$Panels.$C$3:$J$3;0))) Since
2007 formula written with A1 style, how is it possible to convert the A1

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.