Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 796113
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:35:27+00:00 2026-05-14T22:35:27+00:00

A simple append function like this (in F#): let rec app s t =

  • 0

A simple append function like this (in F#):

let rec app s t =
   match s with
      | [] -> t
      | (x::ss) -> x :: (app ss t)

will crash when s becomes big, since the function is not tail recursive. I noticed that F#’s standard append function does not crash with big lists, so it must be implemented differently. So I wondered: How does a tail recursive definition of append look like? I came up with something like this:

let rec comb s t =
   match s with
      | [] -> t
      | (x::ss) -> comb ss (x::t)
let app2 s t = comb (List.rev s) t 

which works, but looks rather odd. Is there a more elegant definition?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:35:27+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:35 pm

    Traditional (not tail-recursive)

    let rec append a b =
        match a, b with
        | [], ys -> ys
        | x::xs, ys -> x::append xs ys
    

    With an accumulator (tail-recursive)

    let append2 a b =
        let rec loop acc = function
            | [] -> acc
            | x::xs -> loop (x::acc) xs
        loop b (List.rev a)
    

    With continuations (tail-recursive)

    let append3 a b =
        let rec append = function
            | cont, [], ys -> cont ys
            | cont, x::xs, ys -> append ((fun acc -> cont (x::acc)), xs, ys)
        append(id, a, b)
    

    Its pretty straight-forward to convert any non-tail recursive function to recursive with continuations, but I personally prefer accumulators for straight-forward readability.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 445k
  • Answers 445k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Sounds like the problem is the browser is changing the… May 15, 2026 at 6:47 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The remote file has to first be downloaded to your… May 15, 2026 at 6:47 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you can use awk, $ awk -F"['-]" '/VERSION[ \t]=/{print $2}'… May 15, 2026 at 6:47 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.