Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7629313
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T05:48:19+00:00 2026-05-31T05:48:19+00:00

A table in my database is expected to grow about 250,000 rows every year.

  • 0

A table in my database is expected to grow about 250,000 rows every year.

My fear is that it may slow down the client app, and probably pass the 30 sec runtime of MYSQL.

What should I do about this? Would MySQL be able to handle this, or I should go for a stronger ( IMO ) database like Microsoft SQL 2012?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T05:48:21+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 5:48 am

    250k rows is not huge. 10 million is still perfectly fine (40 years, I guess it won’t last that long), even half the time (20 years) would still be a long time for a software system.

    If you create your queries properly, and set the right indexes, you should be fine. Always check with EXPLAIN EXTENDED if your indexes are properly used on a query.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a database table that i want to allow my friends to update.
I have a database table on a development server that is now fully populated
Here is something that troubles me as I am creating a database table columns.
In a database I have less than 200,000 records in a table, and in
In my MySQL installation I have one InnoDB database that I know will grow
Assume that in a database table there is a non-key column called RECORD_ID which
Which Database table Schema is more efficient and why? Users (UserID, UserName, CompamyId) Companies
Suppose a database table has a column Name which is defined as key for
Using Access Database Table ID Time 001 100000 001 100005 001 103000 001 102500
i have database table like this +-------+--------------+----------+ | id | ip | date |

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.