abstract class Table {
private val records: Int
}
Is it because we have to create an instance of an abstract class before we can access its private member?
abstract class Table { private val records: Int } Is it because we have
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
abstract class Table {
private val records: Int
}
Is it because we have to create an instance of an abstract class before we can access its private member?
I would imagine this is because there is no way to make them concrete:
would fail, because
recordsis private toTable.It would make
Tablekind of useless. I can’t see that it would hurt anything, just it almost certainly indicates a mistake by the programmer.