Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9129475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T07:45:20+00:00 2026-06-17T07:45:20+00:00

access(2) man page says, CAVEAT Access() is a potential security hole and should never

  • 0

access(2) man page says,

CAVEAT
Access() is a potential security hole and should never be used.

But what is the security hole and why I should not use it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T07:45:21+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 7:45 am

    Linux Man pages clearly describes it

    Warning: Using access() to check if a user is authorized to, for example, open
    a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because
    the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening
    the file to manipulate it
    . For this reason, the use of this system call
    should be avoided.

    Also note. For security reason security exploits are not easily reachable to public.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I went through the Linux man page for access command, but not sure about
According to man 5 proc , one can use the /proc filesystem to access
I can't access rails man page. How can I fix this? Thanks nuno@Houdini:~/workspace/depot_a$ man
With the same access token as the one I used to create a page
I have a multithread linux program which uses epoll(7). The epoll(7) man page says
Access modifiers like public , private are not allowed on static constructors in C#.
To access a remote database, I first have to use a program called Shrew
Which access modifiers which when used with the method makes it available to all
According to the Linux man page under Ubuntu CLOCK_MONOTONIC Clock that cannot be set
I am presenting Git to a 10 man programming team who currently use Visual

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.